Chess
 This article is a stub. You can help 1d4chan by expanding it |
According to /tg/ chess is just a cheap western knockoff of the much superior ancient Chinese game of go. Despite its rampant popularity, it is obvious it fails in everyway to simulate war, tactics, combat or anything else it has been hyped over for centuries about. Common complaints include the lack of army list and deployment options, the Knight's plain weird movement and the fact that the King is both the most important piece and completely useless.
Rules
Basic rules:
Two players play this game.
The players' goal is to kill the King of the opponent. This is called a checkmate; the persian "Shāh Māt" literally means "The king is dead" with some changes in Arabic. If the king is threatened, we call it chess and - becasuse of the Brutality Rule (below) (and because you would immediatly lose after it) - you cannot allow him to be killed. You have to:
- Move the King away,
- Get a piece of your own between the King and the piece threatening to provide cover or
- Capture the attacker piece.
If you can't do any of these, the death of the King is inevitable, you lose.
If a King is dead, his troops will surrender IMMEDIATLY. If you expose your king but you can kill the enemy king in the next move, you still lose (and thus, are not allowed to expose him in the first place, because of the Rule of Brutality).
You can also lose when you resign, or if you run out of time (on a timed game, only professional games). If neither player has enough resources to kill the enemy King, or if both players agree to this, the game ends in a tie. Stalemate also ends the game in a tie, look below.
The game doesn't encourage passive play, if the same position is repeated three times or if 50 turns pass without moving a pawn or killing anyone, there is no progress made and both players are allowed (not forced) to claim a tie.
The battlefield is an 8 by 8 board, the columns (files) marked with letters, the rows (ranks) with numbers so that the squares can be referenced easily (with d4 or similarly). The board is checkered, h1 is white.
The game is played in turns, one turn is the period of time between (for example) before white's move to after black's next move.
Brutality rule: Even pre-teen kids play this game, so no actual killing is ever shown. The game ends if a king is threatened with inevitable "capture". So, it's against the rules to expose your king (for example, by moving a piece previously granting cover to the king (think of it as if the piece was pinned down) or moving the king to a threatened square) because the opponent could kill the king. (These moves would only be good for losing anyway.) Also, when killing any other pieces, it's officially called capturing them.
Combat system: In this game, initiative is key because there aren't tons of hit points granted for every piece. If your piece attack first, even your pawn can kill the enemy queen, because everyone has only 1 HP. Everyone is always surprised (appearantly they don't really want to fight and only the King makes them to) so if it's your turn, you can capture any piece you threaten. You can't attack pieces in cover (except with the Knight). You can't move without attacking (except with the pawn) but you can attack empty squares too (again, except with the pawn). If you attack either an empty square or an enemy piece, you'll win the fight and you must move the attacking piece to the attacked square. This move is compulsory, you cannot decide not to. You can't attack your own piece, even when they provide cover for the enemy, the game isn't set in That One Grimdark Setting. Quite easy, and streamlined, eh? Guess it reminds you of something...
The pieces:
Unlike similar games, you don't get to assemble your battleforce. It is probably because the field is rather small (40' by 40'), and both players have 16 pieces. So the starting force is the same for both players (approximated to be a 38 points army).
King: The weakest piece, basically he is on the battlefield to give the army the morale bonus to fight indefinitely. (I think they drug their troops.) He can attack all the squares around him like any normal D&D characters. He isn't worth any points and you must field one to play.
Rook: You have got two of these quite powerful pieces. They are basically castles with cannons on them so they can attack everything in the row and column they are at (but watch out, Cover rules apply for them too). For some unexplained reason they can only attack once in the turn. Funnily enough, they too have to move to the square they attacked. They are said to be worth 5 points.
Bishop: People will tell you that he has similar powers then the Rook. Don't believe them! Basically, they can do everyhing the Rook can, but only diagonally, which means that half of the battlefield is simply as unreachable to them as if it was in another continent. This is why you get 2 of them, one for the white, and another for the black square. For this, they are apprised(?) to worth 3 points.
Queen: This is easy. She gets to do everything the Rook AND the Bishop combined can. She is the strongest piece of your army, she really doesn't get -4 STR. There is obviously only one Queen. Worth 8 (=5+3) points.
kNight: This is the most contreversial piece of the Chess army. People will tell you that it's difficult to keep in mind how they can attack. Lies! It's very easy: a Knight is basically a character with a reach weapon. He can't attack squares next to him and he can attack all the squares 10 feet of him, except the ones which the Queen would be able (most likely balance reasons). This leaves 8 attackable pieces. He can also attack pieces behind cover. Still, for their limited range, they get only 3 points. However, you get to field 2 of them.
pawn: The backbone of your army, they are the only ones which can move without attacking. You've got 8 of them, and they can move only forward one step in a turn. If they haven't moved or attacked yet, they can move two squares to give them a head start. They however, can't attack forward, only diagonally, forward-left or forward-right, and they can't attack empty squares. They seem quite weak and indeed, they are the unit of point-counting, only worthing 1, but this changes when they reach the opponent's end of the battlefield. When they are there, they don't get unusable, they get special powers instead: They will become a queen, a rook, a bishop or a knight (your choice). This doesn't even take a turn, at the moment they reach the end of the battlefield, you can switch the pieces. In professional play, the arbiter can provide you with the extra piece, in casual play, you can surely use counters. If your opponent claims that you can only use previously captured pieces, either he lies or I do right now.
Army setup:
This is also set in stone like battleforce assembling, White can place pieces from a1 to h2, black from h8 to a7.
You place the King and the Queen to the middle of the row closest to the players: Queens d1 and d8, Kings e1 and e8.
Next to them (c1, g1, c8, g8) come the bishops, then the knights and finally the rooks.
The second row (a-h 2 and a-h 7) is filled with the 8 pawns of the players.
The gameplay:
First both players roll a die. Whoever rolled higher rejoices; white starts. The players take turns after each other to play.
To maximise tactical combat, you and your opponent can use only one piece in a turn, unlike games where you move all of them in the same turn.
In your turn, you have to attack (or move) with a piece. You can't pass. After all, this battle is lead by The King Himself, we can't just do nothing!
If you can't move but your King isn't threatened right now, the game end in a tie. This is called a stalemate and is ofen the refuge of the inferior side in the endgame.
Special rules:
- Attack of Opportunity:
This game is older than D&D so people will like to call it "en passant" instead, and this is easier then the AoO rule of D&D. If an enemy pawn moves 2 pieces (from where he started), and it arrives right next to (1 step to the left or the right) a pawn of yours, you can attack it mid-move (as if it only moved 1 square). The attack will be successful and your pawn moves to the square the other pawn was at the time of the AoO, as usual. However, doing so will take your next turn so you don't have to do that and until you use up your next turn, you'll have time to decide to do that.
- Castling:
If you think that your King is too exposed, you can "castle" him by moving the King two squares toward the Rook you want to use for this maneuver, and immediatly placing the castle to the far side of the king. It only takes 1 turn and thus, is a really powerful move. However, this has multiple conditions:
- The King and the Rook you want to use didn't attack previously
- There are no pieces between the Rook and the King
- The King isn't threatened and he doesn't move through threatened squares (we assume that in older editions all pieces got AoOs against the King and this move was forbidden because of the Brutality Rule). Of course you cannot move him onto a threatened square either. These rules don't apply to the Rook.
- To munchkins: The King and the Rook must be on the same row, you cannot castle with a pawn-rook.
Professional players claim that Chess is serious business so they invented a lot of extra rules like this football (I won't call it soccer!) throw-in rule: "At the moment of delivering the ball, the thrower must face the field of play, have both feet on the ground on or outside the touch line, and use both hands to deliver the ball from behind and over his head." - unneeded rules for the sake of penalising the other player. I won't 1d4ise these, so straight from Wikipedia:
Okay, this is damn bloody long so I hid it. If you want to read these, you can on the Edit page. If anyone has a better way to hide it, be my guest.
If any of the rules isn't clear for you, 1.) you don't belong to 1d4chan and 2.) go look it up on That Other Wiki where it's not written to be similar to /tg/s.