Industrial Revolution

Knights clash, Nobles Plot, Kings Proclaim and Priests Preach. But for all their ambition, passion, glory, drive and zeal it's a few modestly well off men trying to figure out how to better drain flooded mines that change the world

"The more we progress the more we tend to progress. We advance not in arithmetical but in geometrical progression. We draw compound interest on the whole capital of knowledge and virtue which has been accumulated since the dawning of time. Some eighty thousand years are supposed to have existed between paleolithic and neolithic man. Yet in all that time he only learned to grind his flint stones instead of chipping them. But within our father's lives what changes have there not been? The railway and the telegraph, chloroform and applied electricity. Ten years now go further than a thousand then, not so much on account of our finer intellects as because the light we have shows us the way to more. Primeval man stumbled along with peering eyes, and slow, uncertain footsteps. Now we walk briskly towards our unknown goal."

– Arthur Conan Doyle

"The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race."

– Opening line of a copypasta that goes on to detail all the good things that have come from it.

The Industrial Revolution was a period from about 1776 to 1914 which proved to be a major game changer for humanity. Many periods of history are laid out arbitrarily by historians for book-keeping purposes. An English peasant born at the tail end of the High Middle Ages in 1340 who was lucky enough to see the beginning of the Renaissance about 90 years later most likely wouldn't think that the world at the time of his birth was all that different from the one in which he died, even if he was glad that the whole "everybody's dropping dead of plague" spell did not come back. The same would not be true if said English fellow was born in 1780 and died in 1870. In that time the majority of people had moved from the countryside to cities, factories were making everything, you could cross the country in a train in a day and send a message to newfangled Dominion of Canada at the speed of light.

Technology

A Victorian Factory, Watch your Hands

The big thing of note here is energy. For most of the history of civilization, if humans wanted to do something like move a heavy object from point A to Point B, dig a hole, grind grain, work iron, or whatever else, they had to do it with muscle power, either their own, other peoples' or draft animals like oxen and horses. Later, they worked out how to put wind and flowing water to use with sails, watermills and windmills. These things were useful in their own right and by the 1700s they were used in a wide variety of operations, but both had serious limitations. There are only so many rivers where you can build water-powered mills and even in windy places there are calm days, so they primarily supplemented good hold man/horsepower. A human can produce about 100 watts (joules per second) of motive power continuously, while a horse can provide about 750 watts. In contrast a kilogram of wood produces about 16-21 megajoules of energy when burned and coal has about 30 megajoules, which comes in the form of heat. Steam engines use boiling water to turn that heat into motive force which can operate factory machines, propel ships and locomotives to carry cargo, dig ditches and more. Once they had been refined to a level of practical efficiency, steam engines forever changed the nature of how work got done. First this was done by belts, gears, and rods, and later by electrical power generated by steam (or other sources) turning generators to power electric motors and lights.

One of the key advances of the Industrial Revolution was the assembly line, which allowed rapid construction of goods by giving each worker a single task to be repeated instead of requiring they have specialized knowledge of the whole process. While this idea goes back to at least the Venetian Arsenal in the Middle Ages, it became the standard during this era thanks to breakthroughs in milling, grinding, and lathing metal powered by steam (these machines were also a pre-requisite for the creation of precision instruments, without which you can't even make the machines that make the machines that make the final product). One side effect of making things on an assembly line is that items were broken into interchangeable parts that were replaceable if they broke, where before repairs were specialized work done by craftsmen, if they could be accomplished at all. The assembly line ultimately led to the proliferation of cheap automobiles, which revolutionized the concept of personal transport; the most prominent example was the Ford Model T, which was the first inexpensive mass-market automobile and remains one of the most-sold cars in history. These early cars all had unique controls and the modern, standardized control layout would not be invented until 1916 and would not achieve popularity until after 1922. Likewise, while assembly line techniques blossomed in the late 19th and early 20th century, it wouldn't be until World War II that quality control was tight enough that parts were interchangeable between factories.

Education also improved and became more universal during this era. By 1800 literacy was near universal in the United States, though this figure may not be counting slaves. Indeed, high literacy was critical to the American Revolution, which made extensive use of mass-printed propaganda like Common Sense. Public education further improved these literacy rates. Democracy would gradually rise in prominence during this period thanks to increased literacy. The abolition of slavery and women's emancipation would also make serious progress during this era as an extension of the rise in literacy.

Photography was invented in the early 1800s and perfected by the 1840s, when Louis Daguerre invented the process he so humbly named after himself. The proliferation of cheap and (relatively) easily reproduced photographic images took the world by storm. Souvenir and formal photographs became a big business, along with the much creepier death photos (since it took a few minutes to capture a photo with the daguerreotype process, some people found it easier to pose a dead person than to get a live one to sit still). Battlefield photographs from the American Civil War brought the brutality of war into the public eye for the first time. Film recording also got its start during the Industrial Revolution, with the first stroboscopic animations appearing in the 1830s and stereoscopic viewers emerging a decade later. The real revolution came when Eadweard Muybridge worked out how to display a series of static photographs as a single moving image, followed swiftly by George Eastman's invention of the first photographic film in 1884 and the development of the first motion picture cameras by Louis LePrince in 1887. Other inventors and pioneers like Emile Reynaud, Ottomar Anschütz, Robert W. Paul, the Lumiere brothers, and Georges Méliès furthered the technology and brought cinema to the masses for the first time.

Weapons technology advanced by leaps and bounds. At the start of the Industrial Revolution, the average soldier was armed with a smoothbore flintlock musket that could be shot maybe four times a minute and was accurate to a hundred yards at most. Breech-loading rifles came around very shortly into the period, though the complexity of the mechanism made large scale manufacture impossible. Guns became mass produced (and were among the first complex machines with metal mechanisms to be so), but over the early 19th century rifling became standard and switched over to percussion cap firing mechanisms and were complemented by the first mass-produced revolvers. Starting in 1848, muskets began being phased out for breech-loading rifles. Metallic cartridges and smokeless powder would arrive towards the end of this era. Since black powder would rapidly foul any repeating action, smokeless powder was critical to the function of any self-loading firearm. Machine guns made their first appearance in the 1880s with Sir Hiram Maxim's invention of his namesake gun. Self-loading pistols emerged as well. Artillery advanced from simple iron tubes firing iron balls or canister rounds straight ahead to breech-loading steel guns which fired high-explosive shells on predictable ballistic trajectories.

Of course, there was a downside. Industrialization did generate a lot of wealth, but not everyone profited from it. Rural landlords found that their fields were full of surplus farmhands who weren't needed and promptly kicked them off their land to go live in dirty overcrowded cities full of cheaply made apartments into which people were crammed like sardines. To get enough to survive, everyone in a poor family older than six would have to work in hellish, unsafe conditions for 12 hours or more, often operating dangerous machines that could maim or kill an unwary operator in the heat, dark, stink and noise of it all while their bosses forcibly locked their workers into the building.

There were various responses to these conditions, some of which were more extreme than others. The best-known of these is the concept of the labor union, which allowed for workers in the same industry to group together and demand better working conditions from their employers. This era also saw the rise of regulations against child labor, improved safety standards and so forth. And of course, there was the enormous amount of pollution and general environmental destruction, whose effects are coming back to bite us in the ass a little over a century later. It was a legendary problem even then; the famed "London fog" that you see in every Victorian-era depiction of the city was caused by every house and business in London burning coal for heat, kicking vast amounts of soot and pollutants into the air and generating thick, toxic smog.

Napoleonic Wars

"All in all, French armies wrought much suffering in Europe, but they also radically changed the lay of the land. In much of Europe, gone were feudal relations; the power of the guilds; the absolutist control of monarchs and princes; the grip of the clergy on economic, social, and political power; and the foundation of ancien régime, which treated different people unequally based on their birth status. These changes created the type of inclusive economic institutions that would then allow industrialization to take root in these places. By the middle of the nineteenth century, industrialization was rapidly under way in almost all the places that the French controlled, whereas places such as Austria-Hungary and Russia, which the French did not conquer, or Poland and Spain, where French hold was temporary and limited, were still largely stagnant."

– Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Why Nations Fail

"In early life he may have been a sincere republican; but he hated anarchy and disorder, and, before his campaign in Italy was over, he had begun to plan to make himself ruler of France. He worked systematically to transform the people's earlier ardor for liberty into a passion for military glory and plunder."

– Willis Mason West

Imagine a world where Tom Cruise succeeded in killing Hitler and then Rommel proceeded to do all the conquering that Hitler promised to do except without all the genocide, only to lose it all by invading Russia in winter. Replace Hitler with Maximilien Robespierre and Rommel with Napoleon Bonaparte and that's basically the Napoleonic Wars.

France was a shit place to live if you were a peasant and always had been, but the 1790s were particularly shitty. Like "why is my bread made of sawdust" shitty (no, really, that happened). Seeing that America had done all right for itself after throwing out the monarchy, a bunch of French people decided they had nothing to lose and tried the same. Things got a little out of hand as they tend to in France and before long a young military officer decided that the best course of action was to shoot some protesters with cannons, and the country loved him for it.

Now that he was in control, Emperor Napoleon had a relatively short to-do list: Lead and shape ManFrenchkind into a psychic race and surpass the Eldar Romans by learning from their mistakes, unite Humanity under one aegis and allow for instant communication and travel across all human inhabited worlds, kill literally every Xenos Brit(is there really much of a difference?) and most importantly, prevent another calamity like the Age of Strife or Fall of the Eldar Roman Empire.

Five coalitions were raised against the Emperor's Great Crusade, and each was smashed to pieces by his Astartes Horse Artillery and the Solar Auxilia Garde Impériale. This went on until the Emperor was betrayed by Horus the weather. In the disastrous invasion of Isstvan V Russia, the Grand Army would suffer 80% losses, many due to freezing to death.

While Napoleon would fight against two more coalitions against him, the defeat in Russia would prove to be the beginning of the end.

To fund these wars Napoleon sold the United States a huge chunk of land that's now known as the Louisiana Purchase. This was actually controversial in the United States at the time since it wasn't explicitly allowed by the Constitution of the United States. The sheer size of the acquisition surprised nearly everyone except Napoleon; the negotiators sent by President Jefferson were only looking to acquire New Orleans and access to the Mississippi. Napoleon was eager to divest himself of his New World holdings because they were more trouble than they were worth (a lesson Spain never took to heart and the British only after a very long time); this was shortly after France embarrassingly lost Haiti to the world's first (and so far only) successful large-scale slave revolt. Ultimately, the argument that the power to make treaties was sufficient to make a treaty exchanging money for land won out and American settlers soon flooded the largely undeveloped land. Another lasting consequence was that Napoleon's government offered a large reward for anyone who could develop a cost-effective method of preserving food. Nicolas Appert claimed this prize when he discovered that food cooked in sealed jars would last for a long time (even though he admittedly had no clue why it worked). This would eventually be refined into canning.

The key to Napoleons success on the battlefield was mainly due to two factors. The first was that he abolished the system of purchasing military ranks, which was the norm for all other European states at the time. It didn't matter if you never even saw a musket in your life, if you laid down 10.000 Francs, you were a General of his majesty now, congratulations. Napoleon abolished this entirely, granting ranks and the prestige that came with them exclusively through merit. If you were a compentent commander, it didn't matter how high your birth or how thick your briefcase was, you could rise all the way to the top to become of Napoleons famous Marshals (although that didn't stop Napoleon from engaging in some dubious nepotism here and there - in the end, two of his brothers ended up becoming Marshals too and his son-in-law not just a Marshal, but also King of Naples). This in turn not only guaranteed that his armies and divisions were lead by the crème dé la crème of his Generals, but also increased the morale and motivation of his troops dramatically, beyond just the patriotic fervor of the years prior. Whereas the soldiers of Russia, Prussia or Austria were mostly impoverished farmhands or unlucky vagrants, pressed into uniforms and drilled until the last vestiges of humanity were stripped away, Napoleons soldiers were proud, willing to take risks and hungry for glory and promotions.

The second was that he revolutionized logistics and offensive tactics. Napoleon can arguably even be credited with inventing the basic concept of modern maneuver warfare from whole cloth. To give some context: Armies during the tail end of the 18th century usually moved in large, single formations, which mainly served the purpose of stopping any of the aformentioned pressganged sods from deserting too early. The thought of splitting up into smaller forces didn't really occur to the strategists of that time since the sense of honour put an emphasis on big, decisive single battles with little room for skirmishes. Such a big, central force had to be upkept, so they carried a sizeable chunk of civilians with them (it wasn't unheard of that the total amount of people moving in an army were at least half of the fielded manpower): metalworkers to repair cannons, smiths to make nails and horseshoes, the actual wives and children of many soldiers in the army and also, what might seem utterly bizarre to us today, people that could only be described as tourists. Napoleon did away with the civilians in his armies entirely, keeping only a number of specialists like sappers and engineers on hand, preferring to instead aquire (yes, aquire, civilians that had their possessions lifted in this system were entitled to compensation after the fighting was over and looting was heavily punished) their supplies from the cities and countryside he marched through. This gave him a massive advantage in operational flexibility and allowed him to march quicker into advantageous positions or exploit the flanks of his enemies. Another advantage of this system was that it allowed Napoleon to split his forces up into smaller divisions and corps that had permission to act independently from the main force and when opportunity arose. A common theme of diary entries of Generals that fought against Napoleon was how he always managed to take them by surprise in places they least expected attacks from. It has to be said though that Napoleons massive skill as a micromanager was often the single part that kept this machine going; in theaters were he wasn't personally involved, it generally fell apart when less competent commanders tried to do the same and felt overwhelmed in the face of the flow of information and constant decisionmaking they had to process, like in Spain and during the retreat out of Russia.

The War of 1812

The young USA would engage in its own concurrent fight against the British. In 1812, the U.S. declared war on the British over press-ganging of American sailors... two days after the British put a stop to it (transatlantic communication at the time could go no faster than transatlantic ships, which took roughly two months). The official casus belli aside, the real reason the United States declared war on Britain was in retaliation for British support of Tecumseh's Shawnee Confederation and a desire to conquer Canada. Despite terrible results for the US on land, which saw the White House burned down by Canadians, the U.S. did better than expected on the naval front. Even with Napoleon tying up most of the Royal Navy, the hastily raised and underfunded U.S. Navy matching them was a serious accomplishment.

One especially notable U.S. vessel was the United States floating battery Demologos (retroactively renamed the Fulton after its creator), the first documented steam warship. However, the principle muscle of the USN was the nation's first six frigates, originally constructed to fight the Barbary pirates. Although they were relatively old ships by the start of the war, they were still well armed, sturdy, exceptionally fast for their weight and virtually cannon-proof due to their composite-armor-like hulls, built from American live oak instead of comparatively flimsy European wood. This is where USS Constitution got her nickname of "Old Ironsides"; during a battle with HMS Guerriere, one of her crewmen watched shot after shot bounce off Constitution's hull like a Tau punching a Space Marine and famously shouted "Huzzah! Her sides are made of iron!" After a string of high profile defeats the Royal Navy forbade their captains to engage them with less than a two-to-one advantage.

In December 1814 both sides declared peace since they weren’t getting anywhere and the original cause for the war was no longer applicable. On 8 January 1815 [sic] the Battle of New Orleans was fought and ended in an overwhelming U.S. victory, despite the war already being over (see the above point of communication being slow).

Transportation

In 1800, if you wanted to get from point A to point B your options were limited. You could always walk, in which case you might be able to cover maybe 50 kilometers a day at 4kph if you're in good health and traveling light. Catching a lift on a farm wagon was about as fast, but it's not you doing the walking. If you had the cash, you might use a stagecoach, drawn by a team of horses which were regularly swapped out and could go along at 13-16kph if the roads were good (and that's a big If). A sailing ship might be able to match that speed if there was favorable conditions (and that was a big if) and would be on the move 24 hours a day. Most people of the period lived their whole lives without going more than 30km from their birthplace; travel was the domain of elites, the wealthy, merchants and their associates, and armies on the march. While there had been refinements (some of which were fairly substantial, especially with ships) this basic set-up had been the case since the Bronze Age. But this ancient order would soon be overturned by steam power.

First there were steamboats with experiments starting in the 1700s in Britain, France and America. It was a fairly straightforward idea: take a boat, slap a steam engine in it, hook it up to a paddle wheel and hope that nothing catches fire or blows up. By the early 1800s there were some steam tugboats. By the 1810s there were paddleboats handling cargo on canals and rivers. By the 1820s there were experimental steamships which could cross the Atlantic mostly using engine power and by the 1830s there were regular transatlantic crossings. The big advantage of a steamship over a sailboat was that it could sail straight into the wind without giving a shit. Voyages that could take months at full sail could be done in a week. Even so sailing ships still persisted for some time in some roles as they did not need their coal bunkers topped off all the time.

Self-powered ships were a big deal for maritime trade, but on land something new rolled down the lines. Steam locomotives started put hauling carts in English and coal mines, then upgraded in 1826 to moving freight and passengers. In 1829, Stephenson's Rocket managed to achieve the amazing overland speed of 48 kph. Things only escalated from there. By the 1830s, there was a full blown railway boom in the UK as rail lines snaked their way over the British Isles and their colonies. The US followed soon after, then the French and gradually the Germans, Spanish, Russians, Italians and so forth got in on the game. For the United States in particular railways shaped the cultural landscape of the country. Chicago and several other cities went from podunk towns to major cities thanks to their use as a rail hub and expansion of the rail network west was a key tool in settling the frontier. The same applied to Canada with the Canadian Pacific. The big American rail companies also became massively powerful Megacorporations in the modern sense. In the latter of half of the century, trams and trolleys began to emerge for use inside cities, providing the forerunner to modern public transit services.

From moving Iowa grain and bananas from Havana to the European market to sparking the beginnings of tourism to the creation of the first suburbs, both steamships and railways transformed national economies and the ways people lived and worked. They also changed warfare. Steamships could easily outmaneuver and outrun pure sailing vessels; on land trains could easily move soldiers and supplies in huge numbers.

This was also the time when humanity first took to the air. The first hot-air balloons appeared in the late 18th century and were gradually refined. In 1852 the French built a hydrogen balloon with a small steam engine, allowing the operator to move it about as he wished. Further experiments were made through the latter half of the 19th century with lighter than air flight. At the same time, inventors began to work with gliders to achieve heavier than air flight. Despite the claims of a few derpy dorks forever consigned to be laughingstocks that heavier than air flight was impossible for humans, the Wright Brothers managed to achieve powered flight in 1903.

Communications

Similarly communications made quantum leaps ahead. When the Founding Fathers signed the Constitution, you sent a message long distance by writing it down and giving it to either a courier on horseback or a ship. This meant that it would take months for news to get from China to Britain and vice versa for the reply.

The first optical telegraph system was built in 1793, and the French Empire under Napoleon greatly expanded this network and made good use of its ability to transmit signals across great distances. The electrical telegraph evolved during the same time period, but the British and French initially ignored it because they thought the optical system was just fine. This didn't stop inventors from refining and perfecting the device, and the first commercial electric telegraph came online in 1837, with widespread adoption occurring shortly thereafter. Undersea cables were laid across the Atlantic, Mediterranean, Indian, and Pacific, connecting the world for the first time. Early versions of telex and fax machines used the technology as well. Interestingly enough, the Telegraph was in some ways like a proto-internet. It was operated by a network of users which formed their own community with romances, chatter and memes, users contrived elaborate systems of coding to convey lots of information with a few words and while people could make massive amount of money off it either by running companies or getting up-to-date information on world potato prices it was also a prime vehicle for fraud and other such skullduggery.

In the 1890s came Guglielmo Marconi and wireless telegraphy, which quickly became the standard comms equipment for ships and is the main reason anyone survived the sinking of the Titanic. Alongside this came the discovery of radio waves, which went quickly from experimental technology to cheap, mass-produced sets. The telephone was also invented in the late 19th century.

Meiji Revolution

"智識ヲ世界ニ求メ大ニ皇基ヲ振起スべシ (Knowledge shall be sought throughout the world so as to strengthen the foundation of imperial rule.)"

– Meiji Charter Oath

Railways come to the land of the Rising Sun, memorialized in Woodcut

During the Age of Exploration, Japan had closed its borders to most of the outside world to prevent foreign influence (even going so far as to kill castaways, missionaries and their converts - even Japanese sailors who were rescued by foreign ships were prevented from returning home), and for a time, the Shogunate was successful in preventing Europeans from encroaching on Japan like they had in so many other parts of the world. This came to a crashing halt over 200 years later on the 8th of July 1853. The USS Mississippi and some other American ships arrived in Edo to deliver a message from US President (at the time of the Mississippi's departure) Millard Fillmore requesting the reopening of trade. The Mississippi and its companions returned on the 12th of February 1854 and led to the Convention of Kanagawa in March (funny enough, Fillmore's term in office was over before this). There were other developments like the British bombing a port in revenge for a murdered businessman, said port's rulers in the Satsuma domain agreeing to pay reparations by buying warships, having been thoroughly impressed by their firepower, the assassination of the Shogun's number two Ii Naosuke and an attempt to burn the Imperial Palace. This led to a weakening of the ruling Shogunate that allowed Emperor Meiji to seize back power in the violent but swift Boshin War in 1868, permanently ending the Shogunate and the feudal system that had ruled Japan for centuries. The die-hard Shogunate loyalists briefly declared a Republic but they were defeated at Hakodate in the final weeks of the war. One of the foremost Imperial samurai and part of the ruling triumvirate under the Emperor, Saigo Takamori, led his home domain of Satsuma into a brief rebellion after disagreeing with some of the reforms and the triumvirate falling apart with one of them dying of illness and Saigo being rivals with the other guy. During the Battle of Shiroyama Saigo's last charge, mortal wounding and assisted seppuku, followed by the final charge of his 50 remaining followers marked the end of the samurai in the face of conscripted peasants with rifles and cannons. With the last of the big three being assassinated by ex-samurai after the Rebellion, ironically not far from where Naosuke had been shot and decapitated, it was over.

The new Meiji government, not wanting to be consumed and dismembered by the Western powers as many other Asian countries already had, undertook a rapid adoption of Western technology and, eventually, started doing some empire building of its own. On the one hand, the fact that a formerly isolated nation could go from a feudal backwater to a competitive modern nation in just a scant few decades was remarkable. On the other hand, the need to maintain Japan's power to prevent Western imperialism from getting all up in their shit directly led to Japan's own growing military autocracy. Military success against China in 1894, and against Russia in 1905 combined to put Japan on the world stage. The latter conflict especially put the West on notice; everyone had expected Russia to curb-stomp the Japanese, only for the Japanese to kick the shit out of the Russians on land and win an absolutely crushing victory at sea in the Battle of Tsushima. Nearly the entire Russian fleet was wiped out in exchange for three Japanese gunboats and a handful of casualties, one of whom was future admiralissimo Isoroku Yamamoto (he lost two fingers to a bit of shrapnel and would have been discharged if he'd lost a third). The architect of this grand victory, Admiral Heihachiro Togo, was celebrated as a national hero, and his flagship Mikasa is preserved as a museum in Yokosuka. While the samurai as a class lost their traditional power of free money and being able to execute disrespectful peasants, enough of them saw the writing on the wall that they found positions in the new order, using the wealth and education that their families had accumulated to enter politics, the military academy, or found many modern institutions one would recognize today, such as Mitsubishi.

The American Civil War

"We are not only fighting hostile armies, but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war."

– William Tecumseh Sherman preparing to go absolutely fucking scorched earth

The American Civil War is one of those subjects that we could write a shit ton about, but one we could never do the due diligence to be 100% accurate to the events. Needless to say, this is our humble attempt to cover the subject. If nothing else, just know it wasn't about States Rights.

Shortly after achieving independence, a distinction between the newly United States became more and more pressing. The southern colonies had been settled by men who wanted to make a lot of money in the New World and who set up plantations manned by slaves growing tobacco and cotton. The desire to present a united front in the writing of the constitution compromised with the slave states in giving them extra political power a la the 3/5ths compromise, where somewhere around 60% of the black population counted towards a seat in the House of Representatives. Of course, they wouldn't dare let the people who are giving them more power from sharing said power except by making money. The northern colonies were settled by groups who wanted to recreate England (or their ideal version thereof) where the cash crops grown on plantations were not profitable and to whom slavery increasingly became morally repugnant and was perceived as economically unfair.

There was some hope that slavery was on its way out at first (many of the Founding Fathers had believed that the growth of industrialization and the declining price of tobacco would make slavery obsolete and thus left the problem for future generations to solve), and then Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, which made it much easier to process cotton and allowed for the vast expansion of cotton plantations, leading the slave owners to become very wealthy and invest their profits in buying more slaves to pick more cotton. Even those who did not profit directly from slavery still supported the institution, if only because they were terrified of the possibility of a slave revolt or an outright race war, as had been the case in Haiti just a few decades prior.

There was also a growing sense of abolitionism in the North. The British had shut down their transatlantic slave trade in 1807 and abolished slavery in 1833, with France following in 1848. While the number of hard-line abolitionists in the North was comparatively small, they were making headway and there were various groups opposed to slavery to various degrees. Tensions rose gradually in the first few decades of the nineteenth century, from "mere" outright brawls in the United States Senate to the "Bleeding Kansas" incident, to John Brown's attempted slave revolt at Harper's Ferry. This led to the Southern states attempting to create new slave states as fast as possible and other ploys which spiraled things out until South Carolina decided to secede, and James Buchanan refusing to do anything because he sympathized with the southern cause. Fearing that "The Peculiar Institution" would be contained, constrained, and eventually brought to inevitable extinction, the powers that be in the South pushed for a violent breakaway. This in spite of the fact that Lincoln had historically sought compromise as opposed to taking a hard line on the issue, something that changed as the war progressed.

This war is notable for being the most destructive conflict to take place within the United States, killing 700,000 and leveling several cities, and was among one of the biggest wars that was fought between industrial powers up to that point. One reason for this is that the North simultaneously held that South never left the US and that a total war with intentional targeting of the civilian population and infrastructure was OK. Another was a fear among the North that if the war was not won quickly (regardless of cost in lives) public opinion on it would sour, Lincoln would lose reelection and the war might end without the South's defeat.

The war consisted broadly of two halves, cleanly divided by the Battle of Gettysburg. The first half was characterized by a series of grand maneuver battles in the east in which the Confederates tended to win on account of all the more competent, professional generals picked their side, most notably the legendary tactical genius Robert E. Lee, while the Union had to make do with politicians, corrupt hacks, and old men left over from the War of 1812. Morale was also an important factor; the Confederates tended to be on the average much more motivated, as they were carried by a deep belief that they were fighting a defensive war, something that was amplified in Confederate propaganda. The Union forces, on the other hand were mostly comprised of poor sods from the slums of New English cities like New York that couldn't afford the 100 dollars(12 bucks today) to rid themselves of being conscripted. In some other cases, soldiers were recruited straight from the ships that carried numerous European immigrants, and among these the Irish were the most prominent. A vicious cycle ensued where every moron Lincoln gave command to would boldly set out to conquer Richmond and end the war in one stroke, only to run into Lee playing tower defense on the most unfair terrain available. Union Commander of the Month would furiously throw men at Lee's lines until the grumbling from the ranks started to sound mutinous (Fredericksburg, Manassas, the Peninsula) or just stare at his lines until getting blindsided outta fucking nowhere, usually by Stonewall Jackson (Chambersburg, Chancellorsville, Second Manassas).

Either way, it'd end with the Union sulking back to Washington with about 2/3rds the army they started with. This would repeat several times until eventually Lee got cocky and tried the same thing (Gettysburg and technically Antietam although that was more of a really bloody draw). By the time of Gettysburg, there were Union soldiers (the remnants of the 2nd Maine for example) who could accurately claim to have gone 0 for 11 against the Army of Northern Virginia. At Gettysburg, however, shit went sideways for the Confederates in a big way. General Meade, a halfway competent general, was finally in charge on the Union side, Stonewall Jackson was dead, Jeb Stuart took his cavalry off on a pointless ride to nowhere, the Army of the Potomac found and occupied some of the best defensive terrain of the war, and the Army of Northern Virginia couldn't lever them out of it despite two days of very bloody fighting. This culminated in Lee picking out some of his best divisions and ordering them to charge up the middle of the Union position, supported by all his artillery. The Union army sat and waited for the the Confederates to finish shooting, then chewed the attacking divisions up with volley fire and artillery like a Carnifex brood tearing through Imperial conscripts. The attack actually breached the Union line, but was smashed and driven back with heavy casualties. The point the Confederates reached on Cemetery Hill is now known as the high-water mark of the Confederacy.

M-i-c, k-e-y, m-o-u-s-e. Who's the leader of the club that's made for you and me?

However, the Western Theater was a different story; a pair of grimdark badasses named Ulysses S. Grant and William Tecumseh Sherman were leading the Union on a steady slog of wins up and down the Mississippi River system. Though there were some touch and go moments, such as at Shiloh, Grant kept his head and his command and ultimately masterminded the successful Vicksburg campaign, which saw him outflank the city after ordering his fleet to do a balls-out run past its defensive batteries before bitchslapping the Confederate defenders back into their trenches and settling in for a siege that lasted until 4 July 1863, the day after Pickett's Charge was shot to pieces at Gettysburg. Losing Vicksburg and New Orleans cut the Confederacy in half and gave the Union unchallenged control of the entire Mississippi, the most important interior waterway in the country. After Gettysburg and Vicksburg, Lincoln scented blood in the air, decided he just wanted to win and didn't care how messy it got, and so gave Grant command of the Army of the Potomac. Grant knew that the Union had more men and more equipment, and if he couldn't outmaneuver Lee, he was perfectly content to win by attrition. Grant sent Sherman rampaging through Georgia like an Eversor with flamers, and then settled in for a year of meatgrinder trench warfare with Lee that was basically just World War One without biplanes and machine guns.

It has to be noted: Grant was not just a "mindless butcher". He had terrible casaulty figures to be sure, but there were reasons for this: One is that Grant had noticed that the Confederates kept beating the Union by whipping them, then waiting to recover, then repeat. So the only real way to deny this to the Confederacy and especially Lee was to keep fighting and keep Lee's Army reeling, preventing any real reinforcement or supply to restore the lost men and material. Grant was bold, and displayed excellent leadership characteristics and a coolness under pressure. So cool, that part of the reason for his victory in the Wilderness campaign was because Lee lost his cool and flung men at a position and expected them to win the day. Yeah, Lee had a habit of this, and it's part of the reason that his reputation as a "tactical genius" is hotly debated to this day.

While the war was started over the issue of slavery, complete emancipation was not one of the North's original war aims. However, as more Southern territory fell to the Union advance, thousands of slaves came into the custody of the Union army, either by being liberated directly or by making a break for it as soon as the bluecoats were close enough. This became troublesome in the latter years of the war, as it presented the Northern generals with a serious logistical and humanitarian challenge: feed not only a fighting army on the move, but their ever-growing train of liberated slaves. This problem was particularly acute for Sherman's March to the Sea. Some Union generals addressed this problem by offering enlistment to liberated slaves, although this practice was not universal. However, many slaves fled Confederate territory to join up with Union forces and a good number of them ended up serving in the Union Army, including the legendary 54th Massachusetts. Ending slavery not only became political policy, but also a weapon of war since it destroyed the Confederacy's economy. This led to the Emancipation Proclamation, issued after Gettysburg, and eventually the adoption of the 13th Amendment and with it the abolition of slavery. The vileness of slavery became more known as Union soldiers saw firsthand the plantations and what it did to black people, and while some didn't give a shit or even thought it was only natural, there were plenty who saw that shit and resolved to send the Confederates straight to hell for it.

The American Frontier

"You have died of dysentery."

– The Oregon Trail

Throughout the mid 1800s Americans spread rapidly westward. This was aided by several large land purchases such as the aforementioned Lousiana Purchase; this was a huge step for the young nation as they now had a major highway (The Mississippi River) linking the entire back country from the Great Lakes down to the Gulf of Mexico. But said expansion would only accelerate after a little incident south of the border where American settlers living in the Texas territory got fed up with the Mexican government and seceded the entire territory north of the Rio Grande. Texas joined the Union and Mexico gave up a bunch of land after getting its ass kicked. This led the United States to stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Fueling this was several gold rushes and a series of Homestead Acts, which gave ownership of land for free if you lived on it and maintained it. Canada also had a western frontier at the same time, but that part isn't nearly as well remembered (Did you play Yukon Trail? Did you even know it existed?). Huge waves of settlers were eager to reach the newly claimed California and Oregon territories, but before any railroads were laid down, they had to travel by wagon through the barren and hostile wilderness in between, with many would-be settlers dying to disease, hypothermia, hyperthermia, attacks from upset Native American tribes, and in at least one infamous case, cannibalism.

This era has long been dramatized to the point it has become its own genre, the Western. This goes so far back The Great Train Robbery, one of the first films with a narrative ever, was a western. Westerns dramatized the "Wild" West as a chaotic wasteland full of bandits and savages where a man would be killed for any or no reason, but historically this was not the case. Statistically the west was actually very peaceful outside of the wars, especially compared to cities out east. The big outlaws, shootouts and murders were simply very publicized because they were unusual. Still, many of these more famous incidents showed how loose the power of the law was out in the frontier, as in several cases, you had several figures who had been on both sides of the law (Billy the Kid’s Regulators, Wyatt Earp’s revenge ride, etc) usually due to conflicting interests between locally powerful factions.

The Unification of Germany

"The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood."

– Otto von Bismarck about the unification of Germany

One of the aftereffects of Napoleon's brief stint into making France the all-encompassing superpower of Europe was that he motivated quite a lot of people to identify themselves with their nation instead of families or rulers. The place where this nascent idea of nationalism reverberated the most were the German states, which had been notorious for their disunity since the age of Charlemagne. Liberal and nationalist ideas that sought to unify Germany into one nation ultimately culminated in a series of revolutions that all failed until Prussia, under the leadership of Otto von Bismarck (a man with a political genius as massive as his mustache), kicked the Austrians out of the German territories and won a war against France in 1871.

The Franco-Prussian War, incidentally, had not a lot to do with Germany in itself. The southern German states (Hesse, Württemberg, Baden and Bavaria) that were still independent from Prussia at this point, leaned towards Austria. Instead it was about... Spain. Spain? What does fucking Spain have to do with Germany? Well Spain had a lot of issues at the time, the most pressing of which that it was a colonial power with no monarchy; their previous queen had been removed from power by a coup. After order had been restored, the question remained whose dynasty should ascend to the Spanish throne. One of the proposed candidates was Leopold of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, a scion of a branch of the Prussian royal family that remained Catholic. France was very paranoid about being outmaneuvered by the Germans and sought to prevent that, but Bismarck carefully manipulated a series of events, including the careful redacting and publication of a diplomatic telegram to make it seem as if the French had pressured the Prussian King to withdraw Leopold's candidacy for the Spanish throne (when in reality Leopold had already declined to Wilhelm) to lure France into a war with Prussia and the German states. And it worked. The South Germans were outraged, and the French found themselves faced with a Hobson's choice: either they could go to war or suffer severe diplomatic embarrassment at home and abroad. The following conflict saw the French being thoroughly curbstomped within eight months as the Prussians outmaneuvered and outgunned them again and again. Massive conscription after the majority of professional soldiers fell into Prussian captivity at Metz and Sedan did little to alleviate the problems. To add insult to injury, the Germans proclaimed their new Empire in Versailles, the old seat of the French kings, driving a wedge between France and Germany that would not be overcome until the 1960s.

The unification of Germany marked a massive shift in the balance of the European powers. The weakest power in the European concert (Prussia) suddenly became the strongest on the continent, with a massive population, a disciplined and modern army that ground every enemy it faced into the dirt like they were nothing, and a huge industrial base that was kicked into overdrive once the multitude of national barriers between the small German dukedoms were abolished (also helped by the reparations France had to pay to the Germans as well as the capture of Alsace-Lothringia and its rich deposits of ore). It grew so fast and rapidly that only in the span of 30 years, it managed to surpass the production levels of steel and coal of every other imperial power in the world and singlehandedly pioneered large-scale industrial chemical production with inventions like the Haber process for synthesizing ammonia from atmospheric nitrogen (invaluable and irreplaceable in anything that has to do with anorganic chemistry, like most of the fertilizers used in contemporary farming). In general the German Empire was at the forefront of what's called the "Second Industrial Revolution" of the late 19th century.

The Germans, being late to the party as far as imperialism was concerned, wanted a piece of that big fat colonial cake that they felt were owed and used their industrial and military leverage to apply massive pressure to the rest of Europe. This, combined with the inherent semi-feudal social order that had persisted in Prussia since the 1600s and the rampant militarism of German society, created a very aggressive nationalist machismo which ultimately contributed a lot to the crisis that led to World War One with all of its cataclysmic consequences. Nearly all negative stereotypes people associate with Germany to this day, like militarism, brutishness, blind obedience, lack of humour, strict workplace discipline, punctuality, and being unemotional come from this particular era. The culture that this attitude bred eventually led to the mindset that gave rise to the Nazis after Germany's defeat in World War I and only started to fizzle out after the old elites of the German Empire were permanently removed from power after World War II forced the Germans to reinvent themselves and their nation.

The British Empire

I dare say, this page is delightfully British. Spot of tea?

"On her dominions the sun never sets; before his evening rays leave the spires of Quebec, his morning beams have shone three hours on Port Jackson, and while sinking from the waters of Lake Superior, his eye opens upon the Mouth of the Ganges."

– The Caledonian Mercury

“C" is for colonies Rightly we boast that of all the great nations Great Britain has most!"- Mrs Ernest Ames, An ABC for Baby Patriots

Remember the British East India Company from the Age of Enlightenment? Well, eventually Britain decided to drop the pretense that it was merely an English corporation that was building colonies everywhere and just owned the fact that, yes, they were trying to take over the world. They hadn't been the only ones; the Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, French, Germans, Russians, and several American presidents were as well, and near the end Japan would try to get in on the action.

The Napoleonic Wars had left the British in the enviable position of having the world's biggest, baddest navy. This was a title they would hold until the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922 and the massive debts the British had racked up during WWI led them to conceded that they would have to be okay with the US Navy equaling them in size. They would lose it entirely after the Second World War, due to the tremendous debts of fighting that war piled on top of the previous one.

Having a massive navy at its disposal meant that the British could effectively dictate terms to anyone within sight of the sea. This persuasion was not solely political strong-arming, but also took the form of general peacekeeping and anti-slavery operations with the West Africa Squadron alone freeing hundreds of thousands of slaves and largely shutting down the Atlantic Triangle. At its height the British Empire had founded colonies or established protectorates on almost every major landmass on Earth, and had presences at the key maritime choke points of Gibraltar, the Suez, the Cape of Good Hope, Singapore, and the Falklands near Cape Horn. It was said that "The sun never sets on the British Empire," which is still technically true due to the existence of the Pitcairn Islands.

The Crimean War

The Crimean War is one of those wars that tends to be forgotten about by non-history buffs, but its effects on the world were out of all proportion to its relatively short duration (October 1853-February 1856). This was the war that gave us Florence Nightingale, the Charge of the Light Brigade, the Victoria Cross, and the Great Reforms of Tsar Alexander II. It was also one of the first conflicts to see widespread use of high-explosive shells, telegraphs, railways, and photography; in some senses it can therefore be considered the first modern war.

The war was ostensibly started over the treatment of Christians in the Ottoman Empire, but in reality it was all about the balance of power in Europe. The Ottoman Empire was in the middle of its long collapse, and Russia was taking the opportunity to flex its muscles in Central Europe. Britain wasn't thrilled by the prospect of Turkey being conquered by Russia, and Napoleon III needed a show of strength abroad to strengthen his position at home. When the Ottomans asked for changes to the agreement on their treatment of Orthodox Christians, Russia threw a fit and declared war. The British, French, and eventually the Italians sided with the Ottomans. At first, the fighting was bloody and inconclusive, with the Russians mauling the Ottomans at the Battle of Sinop and laying siege to Kars but being stopped at Silistra. The British and French promptly sent ships and troops through the Dardanelles into the Black Sea and invaded the Crimea. This is where the Battle of Balaclava and the Siege of Sevastopol took place. Balaclava became famous for the "Thin Red Line" of the 93rd Highlanders and the Charge of the Light Brigade. The Siege was a badly managed, yearlong slog that killed thousands of troops on both sides and wound up killing the British army commander, Lord Raglan, who'd been catching hell in the press since Balaclava and was even more depressed that the Russians were holding out for so long. Ultimately the mounting casualty figures and apparent pointlessness of the whole thing led Britain and France to call for peace negotiations, the outcome of which saw Russia and Turkey handing back the territories they'd captured and Russia losing the right to base ships in the Black Sea. Russia's defeat was seen as a national humiliation and led directly to the Great Reforms of Alexander II. Among other things, he abolished serfdom in the Empire, modernized the military, relaxed press censorship, and reformed the justice and educational systems. Most of these reforms were rolled back by reactionary conservatives after Alexander was assassinated in 1881, which led to increasing unrest in the country's radical underground and may have ultimately contributed to the Russian Revolution in 1917. On the flipside, the British got the lasting cultural legacy of the Light Brigade and Florence Nightingale. Horrified by the reports of wounded British soldiers being treated in atrocious conditions, Florence rolled up her sleeves, went to the Crimea with some of her friends, and effectively invented the modern nursing profession while also pushing for reforms in sanitation that greatly reduced death rates in the field hospitals and would later be implemented throughout India and Britain.

Also led to the birth of the Red Cross and the first Geneva Convention.

The Indian Mutiny

In 1853 the cost of rifling had come down enough that the British could transition from smoothbore firearms supplemented by specialist riflemen, both using the slow and relatively unreliable flintlock system, to standardizing on a rifled, percussion-cap weapon, resulting in the 1853 Enfield. Like many firearms of this era, it was loaded via cartridges consisting of the powder and ball in a sealed paper sleeve. The rifle was loaded by tearing open the cartridge (often by biting it), pouring in the powder, and ramming in the ball. This significant arms upgrade eventually reached India. In 1857 rumors (which were never proven) developed that the cartridges were coated with animal fats including beef tallow and pork lard, pissing off the Hindu and Muslim natives. This proved to the final straw for a long-brewing rebellion. Shortly into the Mutiny, the mutineers at Cawnpore slaughtered women and children who had surrendered. This proved to be a PR disaster for the rebels, killing any claim they had to legitimacy or the moral high ground and enraging the British public enough to warrant a very strong response. One important note is that the mutiny was not total (in fact, the conflict was mostly contained to Bengal), and many colonial troops fought against the mutineers, particularly Sikhs who had no prohibitions on pork or beef and were keen on the idea of getting to kill Hindus and Muslims. The conflict would lead to the effective end of the British East India Company in favor of direct rule (the "British Raj"), which was generally a serious improvement in conditions for Indians if you continued to ignore the lack of influence they had over how they would be ruled.

While relatively short (a year and a half), there was little lull in the action and there are a lot of firsthand accounts one can look through to get an understanding of combat in the era. Of particular note is the several accounts of rebels being shot multiple times with a revolver but living long enough to kill or seriously injure men with their swords, which remain important in any consideration of knife vs. gun. One officer even managed to kill ~10 rebels with a spear by funneling them through a narrow doorway.

As a side note, the rifle at the center of this would eventually be exported to the Confederate States of America (see above) in large numbers, which after its defeat would then be sold surplus to the post-Sakoku Japanese government (see above again).

The Boer Wars

During the Napoleonic Wars the British gained control of every Dutch colony, and while they handed most of them back afterwards, they decided the Cape Colony in what is now South Africa was too good to let go, so they bought it. The Dutch weren't in a position to refuse the offer. A long series of disputes arising from this eventually escalated into a war between the Dutch-descended Boers and the British colonials (the Africans in the region were smart enough to know that they were kinda screwed no matter who won). Both wars were disasters for the British (even though they eventually won the second through overwhelming force) thanks to using Napoleonic tactics in an era of rifled repeating firearms. This was even worse in the first war since the British had not yet ditched their iconic red uniforms. Even after they got wise and switched to khaki, things didn't improve in the early stages of the Second Boer War as Redvers Buller, in charge on behalf of Garnet Wolseley, proved an unmitigated failure, losing battle after battle. After Buller got fired and replaced by Wolseley's rival Frederick Roberts (which caused the British army to basically split in two thanks to tensions between Wolseley's African colonial veterans and Roberts and his Indian troops), the Brits won on the field and the Boers resorted to an insurgency which was brutally suppressed (by which we mean the term "concentration camp" was literally invented here). Adding insult to injury, Roberts replaced Wolseley as Commander-in-Chief after the war.

The Boer Wars have been largely forgotten except by military historians due to their foreshadowing of things to come. One thing that has survived into the present day is the term "commando", which originally referred to the organization of the Boer forces during the wars and acquired its modern usage due to their unorthodox (for the time) tactics this organization enabled.

Notes

• This was the era where Europeans, and the nations descended from them, truly and unquestionably ruled the world. Their head-start in industrialization, advanced military and civilian technology, the vast accumulated wealth from previous centuries, and advanced medicine and agriculture gave them an advantage that any other culture at the time was incapable of overcoming. With that came a lot of nastiness. You see, the notion that people not born with a silver spoon up their arses were worth more than their value as meatshields or manual laborers hadn't caught on yet, and this went double for foreigners. The ruthlessness and blatant disregard for human life with which the imperial powers of the time exploited the people they ruled over caused widespread resentment and led to a long series of uprisings, some more successful than others. Later down the line this exploitation triggered the decolonization movement and the brutal struggle of the underclasses for equal rights and humane treatment (which continue to this day).
• The agricultural revolution, where machines and other modern technology were applied to farming, accompanied the Industrial Revolution. Indeed, the former fed the latter by allowing enough food to be produced that the majority of workers could take factory jobs instead of agricultural work. Additionally, the invention of the Haber-Bosch-process made the large-scale production of anorganic fertilizer from atmopheric nitrogen possible, turning landscapes that were previously thought of as unsuitable for any kind of farming into lush gardens. This earned Fritz Haber, its inventor, the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1919 (at the time a very controversial decision, as Haber also provided his expertise to the German war effort and among other things invented ammonium nitrate as a substitute for TNT and the first chemical weapons to be used in WWI.)
• Several technologies supported the process of industrialization. Steam power helped kick things off by revolutionizing manufacturing and transportation, but two others were also important. Large machinery and tall buildings required steel to become cheap enough that it could be made on a massive scale. Historically, making good-quality steel was a time-consuming process that needed the careful attention of expert craftsmen. This changed with the invention of the Bessemer process, wherein bellows would be used to blast hot air directly into the molten iron to get it hot enough to smelt out impurities. Electricity also helped tremendously, allowing for much longer working cycles through lightbulbs and improved communications through telegraph and radio.
• The invention of vapor-compression cycle cooling was also a major innovation of this era, although until electricity became widely available its use was mostly constrained to steam-powered dairies in cities. This allowed for much denser and heavily mechanized industrial centers, as well greater population in warmer areas. The flush toilet and toilet paper also originated at this time.
• Vulcanized rubber arose during this era. While important for sealing and tires, one major change this facilitated was in clothing. The elastic waistband brought about modern undergarments among other things. The first plastics were invented in the 1860s, but these early plastics were brittle and had few practical uses, so the true rise of plastics would not be till the era of The World Wars and and beyond.
• Food preservation made large advances. For most of human history, food preservation had been limited to drying (through methods including salt, smoke and/or sugar), pickling and (in climates that allowed it) freezing, all of which originated in the Bronze Age at the latest. Now methods like jarring and canning food emerged (though early sealing methods turned out to be toxic themselves), along with serious improvements to old methods like like quick freezing, the electric icemaker/freezer/refrigerator (domestic versions won't appear till the interwar period though), freeze-drying, and spray-drying, led to food that took up much less space while having lifespans measured in years. These methods continue to be refined in the current era, largely through new materials and understanding of microscopic organisms.
  • To add to that, the invention of beef extract by the German chemist Justus von Liebig revolutionized the way food could be produced at larger scales at lower cost. It served as the catalyst for the invention of most modern processed foods and the birth of large scale food factories, where cheap food could be produced to feed an ever increasing amount of mouths, further accelerating the population boom that coincided with the improvement of healthcare as outlined below.
• The invention of modern medicine, which arguably started with the Hungarian doctor Ignaz Semmelweis' research into childbed fever (a dangerous infection of the uterus through bacteria that enter the body after giving birth), delivered the modern template of how medical research is conducted (i.e. You make an observation, formulate an hypothesis based on that observation and employ a study with standardized sets of probands to prove or disprove your hypothesis). Combined with the with the first proof of how bacteria cause sickness through the German doctor Robert Koch and the subsequent triumph of medical hygiene, this newfound understanding of illnesses and plagues that had decimated entire civilizations in the millennia before led to a huge increase in birth rates and life expectancy for every human on the planet. As a result, the world population increased rapidly, starting in the 1850s, a trend that peaked in the 1960s and is continuously decreasing ever since (not that bad of a thing as one might think, with climate change, limited resources and all)
• The Scramble for Africa begins in 1881 and ends in 1914. Almost all modern "explorer" cliches and imagery began here; think Theodore Roosevelt's misadventures, Dr. Stanley Livingston of "I presume?" fame, or the Indiana Jones movies. The two main exceptions, the American frontiersman in his coonskin cap and breastplate-clad Spanish conquistador, are both strongly linked to a specific type and time instead of explorers in general. The stereotype of the great white hunter/explorer wearing a pith helmet, binoculars, and khaki overalls while hacking his way through the jungle with a big-ass knife in one hand and an elephant gun in the other started here.
• Human flight was first achieved in this era. In 1783 the first air balloon flight took place, and was first put to military use in 1794. The Wright Flyer took flight in late 1903, marking the first heavier than air flying machine. Zeppelins became practical just before World War I.
• Naval technology went through multiple revolutions. The wooden sailing ships of the Napoleonic Wars gave way to ironclad tallships with steam and sail propulsion, only to be replaced in turn by warships built entirely from steel. The famous duel of the Merrimack and the Monitor marked the end of wooden warships, the appearance of the steam launch Turbinia led to a transition to turbine engines, and HMS Dreadnought heralded the modern battleship. The first military submarines appeared in the American Revolution and Civil War, although the concept wouldn't be perfected until the Great War.
• The beginnings of feminism started in the 19th century, as women began to lobby for more access to their countries' social, political, and economic spheres. They scored some notable successes. In 1861, property-owning women in Victoria Australia could vote in local elections. In 1890 women gained the full franchise (but could not run for office) in New Zealand, while in 1893 full female suffrage was permitted in Colorado and 1902 saw federal suffrage in the new Commonwealth of Australia. By the late 19th century, the academic profession was opened up to women. It was still pretty damn sexist, but things were in motion.
• The Victorians (or at least those who could afford to do so) went in for elaborate periods of mourning. Not just a wake, funeral, and a catered lunch in formal wear while a funeral home gouges the family, or even sitting shiva for a week. A widow mourning her dear departed hubby was expected to wear black clothing and a veil, put up black ornamentation and wear black jewelry, and act reserved and solemn and so forth for a year. A lot of what we associate with death, mourning and similar subjects has its origins here and the Goths got a lot from it.
• Holiday travel and mass tourism also became a thing here. Though medieval peasants had gotten lots of days off for religious reasons, they typically didn't have much to do or anywhere to go on those days off, being as they were medieval peasants and more often than not used their free time to plow the land they actually owned themselves to prepare for winter. Rich people, of course, had always been able to travel pretty much anywhere they liked, which had led to the rise of the "Grand Tour", wherein young men (and occasionally women) of means would dick around Europe for a few months or years while receiving a classical education, taking in the local culture, and getting laid. The proliferation of railways, steamships, and middle-class jobs made travel a practicable concept for the masses for the first time, so that by the 1870s an average middle-class family could go to the country or the seaside for a vacation or even travel abroad on a package tour. The Grand Tour persisted for a while after this, thanks to nouveau riche Americans taking up the practice, but ultimately it fell out of favor as enthusiasm for classical culture declined.

The appeal of the Industrial Revolution

This era produced many things modern people take for granted and have difficulty considering life without. The rise of film and audio recording during this era and mass printing of advertisement and newspapers during this era mean there is no shortage of records of daily life, so this era is fairly well understood. Of particular note is that the late 1800s printed mail order catalogs started being printed, and these now provide quality information on everyday items, complete with cost and illustrations, that simply don't exist in earlier eras. Those researching earlier eras for this kind of thing have to go through the rare surviving records of estate sales, government orders and business transactions to get a fraction the understanding a layman can obtain from viewing a simple public domain catalog. These have proven such good resources some historically set RPGs outright say to find catalogs from companies like Bannerman (A surplus arms dealer so successful he built a castle on a private island next to West Point as an advertisement, since everyone traveling the Hudson had to see the sign on it), Montgomery Ward, and Sears Roebuck to fill in the blanks of the equipment list. Before this period, historians were mostly concerned with Big Things: wars, generals, kings, nobles, priests and the occasional artist, merchant, architect, engineer or inventor thrown in, often because there was so few records of the common man. In the Industrial Revolution historians became able and willing to adequately research the way people lived their lives day to day, from well-to-do merchants and skilled tradesmen to factory workers to scavengers picking through garbage for bones, rages, scraps of metal and dog turds to sell.

The Industrial Revolution allowed for inventors to not only create meaningful new creations, but see them become common overnight. Before the Industrial Revolution changes generally happened slowly with various small tweaks on things and methods, the compilation of said tweaks rolling over and the occasional breakthrough like the water wheel or gunpowder every once and a while which would take centuries to come into it's own. A peasant would assume that his children, grandchildren and great grandchildren would till the soil just as he did with what changes that did happen in his lifetime being largely minor stuff that tweaked the board but did not change the game. Industrialization changed all that, lives were changed for better or worse by mechanization suddenly and totally. Progress became an idea that would drive the world, even if problems were also mounting. People came to understand that the past was not just the present which happened beforehand and the future could be more than just more of the same. It's not surprising that science fiction started up in the 19th century, as did horror: Jules Verne, HG Wells, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Mary Shelley, and Edgar Allan Poe were all active writers of the era.

This time was also one of upheaval socially and politically. Before the Industrial Revolution people generally operated on the idea that one should "Know One's Station", that society was divided into classes that were (with various degrees of legal formality enforcing this) hereditary, static and instead of trying to get out of them they should stay in them, stay out of the affairs of people of other classes and obey their betters. If you were a peasant you'd work for your lord, obey his orders, treat him with reverence as a higher form of human, be jolly grateful to have such a man as your master and avoid thinking about all that politics stuff which is none of your business. While this had not died out in the Industrial Revolution (see all of England's class stuff), it was on the decline both from gradual erosion and active resistance.

The source of wealth shifted from farms and fields to factories and companies which the merchant classes/bourgeois now owned. To be a noble you needed a peerage at least (in England that is, the rest of Europe, especially Spain and Germany remained static feudal societies at heart, while the French and eventually the Russians abolished it in a literally cutthroat fashion) and preferably a dozen generations of pedigree which your fellow nobs would respect even if you were broke, to be a captain of industry you just needed a lot of money invested in the right companies. It was possible for a poor man to rise to the highest echelons of society in the Industrial Revolution, see Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller. The downside of it was that these rich buggers tended to view the poor which could not rise from rags (ignoring of course how most of these nouveau riche then made it as difficult as possible for anyone to actually join their ranks) as being lazy incompetents that were only fit for ruthless exploitation and that attempting to help them out (beyond providing them with just enough education for them to do whatever work the rich needed them to do and healthy enough to keep working) was not only useless, but an active evil in the long term since it meant only more of them in the long run. To quote Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol:

"Many cannot go there [Workhouses and Prisons] and many would rather die."

“If they'd rather die, they'd better do it and decrease the surplus population."

The Industrial Revolution people had oppressive rigid order and stability swapped out for opportunities to excel and thrive or crash and burn. You could be born dirt poor and rise to riches, or you might start out as a skilled tradesmen who ends up as just another disposable factory worker.

That attitude about the poor went doubly so for the colonial subjects and non-white people in general. In 1876 there was a drought which led to crop failure in much of India, instead of importing food to feed the affected masses (which they'd done not long before successfully) the Raj Government allowed merchants to stockpile grain and sell it abroad to drive the price up. The result was famine and starvation which killed 6-10 million people. The Belgians in the Congo Free State made this look saintly by comparison.

Such treatment of the working class, combined with the belief that since the working class were the actual producers of wealth they should be the ones with the right to decide how the machines and materials used to make said wealth were used, would lead to Karl Marx writing the Communist Manifesto:, creating communism, one of the most notable ideologies of the 20th century and also one of the most controversial.

Ideologies aside you can boil down the Industrial Revolution social movements to the average human thinking: "Hey, we can actually make tons and tons of wondrous gadgets to make life better, but why is that I can't get some of the gadgets too so I can have a better life?". While this meme emerged first in West Europe and North America it inevitably expanded to the colonies and independent nations until it eventually covered the entire planet.

The Industrial Revolution is the start of the Modern World and many of its issues still persist to this day. People can relate to an Industrial Revolution era person more easily than that of a peasant in the Middle Ages, a serf in the Dark Ages, a citizen soldier of the Classical Era, a scribe at a pharaoh's court, a priest king in the Fertile Crescent or Grug and his rocks. The downside of this is that these issues are still politically charged to this day.

Fantasy Relevance

As a tangent from the historical to the literary, the Industrial Revolution is something which often looms in the background of Fantasy at a meta level with various degrees of overtness. The implication is that sooner or latter as the elves in splendid cities and ancient forests weave their spells and loose their arrows, the dwarves delve and hold the line to defend their mountain homes, the orcs sound the drums of war and sharpen their blades for battle, dragons soar, necromancers scheme, kings reign, adventurers set out on epic quests and all that fantastic wonder, somewhere someone notices a pot on the boil rattling its lid and imagines how the force of pressurized steam could be used, setting in motion the end of that era. Yes, that's a gross oversimplification of a centuries long processes with many intermediate steps that culminated with Locomotives and the Crystal Palace. The point still stands that in a world where people like us exist, eventually observant souls, those inclined to tinker, those looking to make work easier and increase productivity and those who can see the work of such inventive souls as the keys to wealth and power will figure these things out and move a society beyond the 15th century with those which refuse to move with the times getting rolled over.

In Tolkien's work this fact is dealt with mostly in subtext of disdain (the industrialists of Middle Earth were villains and the results of their labors were ruin and destruction) and a sense of melancholy as past ages end. In other fantasy settings such as Forgotten Realms there are forces working to stop this, ranging from organizations like the harpers to the Gods enforcing Medieval Stasis. Some settings, like Discworld and to a smaller degree Warhammer Fantasy, accept that this will happen and have the transition woven into their worldbuilding. In fact you can see Pratchett's later works as an answer to Tolkien's criticism towards modernity, while oversimplified in some aspects the Moist von Lipwig Trilogy makes some good explanations towards how industrialization emerged and how it works as well as its potential flaws and shortcomings without going full ludite.

Industrial Revolution inspired Games, Factions and Settings

• Steampunk
• Much of Discworld
• Thief series which are set in a weird blend of medieval fantasy and early industrial revolution.
• Eberron before the Last War. After it Eberron is a cross between Industrial Revolution and interwar.
• Arcanum is a magical world that is currently undergoing a revolution.
• Iron Kingdoms's whole schtick is that it's a typical fantasy setting that developed into this.
• The Skaven, particularly their Weapons Teams and anything related to Clan Skryre. Thankfully one of the reasons why they never achieved world domination in one fell swoop is the overall lack of quality control on their gadgets.

Historical Time Periods
Deep Time:	Prehistory
Premodern:	Stone Age - Bronze Age - Classical Period - Dark Age - High Middle Ages - Renaissance
Modern:	Age of Enlightenment - Industrial Revolution - The World Wars - The Cold War - Post-Cold War