Beastfolk: Difference between revisions

From 2d4chan
Jump to navigation Jump to search
1d4chan>Lolianon
(There, a bit cleaner and less biased, while still getting the point across and including a nice bit of /tg/ BLAM fun)
1d4chan>Lolianon
Line 4: Line 4:
<s>Firstly, beastfolk being no better than furries is itself part of the anti-furry meme, and the argument erupts pretty much whenever there's a slow day.</s> {{BLAM}} {{*BLAM*| HERESY. SUFFER NOT THE FURRY'S LIES, LEST THEY LEAD THE FAITHFUL ASTRAY.}}
<s>Firstly, beastfolk being no better than furries is itself part of the anti-furry meme, and the argument erupts pretty much whenever there's a slow day.</s> {{BLAM}} {{*BLAM*| HERESY. SUFFER NOT THE FURRY'S LIES, LEST THEY LEAD THE FAITHFUL ASTRAY.}}


When they hear the definition of "beastfolk" as "anthropomorphic animals", a lot of newcomers will ask just why beastfolk are accepted when the anti-[[furry]] thing is promoted with such vehemence. What this means in real language is that, on /tg/, a furry is defined by its anthro aspects but also by being a creepy little perv; what /tg/ defines as a "furry" is more complex than just anthro. Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor|chainmail bikini]]. It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.
When they hear the definition of "beastfolk" as "anthropomorphic animals", a lot of newcomers will ask just why beastfolk are accepted when the anti-[[furry]] thing is promoted with such vehemence. What this means in real language is that, on /tg/, a furry is defined by not only by its anthro aspects but also by being a creepy little perv; what /tg/ defines as a "furry" is more complex than just anthro. Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a [[musclegirl]] in a [[Fantasy Armor|chainmail bikini]]. It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.


Mind you, there is a vocal minority on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk is as mindless ravening monsters who have no culture and exist only to be slain. Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.
Mind you, there is a vocal minority on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk is as mindless ravening monsters who have no culture and exist only to be slain. Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

Revision as of 23:01, 11 January 2018

Beastfolk is a term in /tg/'s lexicon used to collectively refer to any race which can be defined as a humanoid animal, an unofficial kinsfolk to terms like demihuman and goblinoid.

Beastfolk vs. Furries

Firstly, beastfolk being no better than furries is itself part of the anti-furry meme, and the argument erupts pretty much whenever there's a slow day. *BLAM* HERESY. SUFFER NOT THE FURRY'S LIES, LEST THEY LEAD THE FAITHFUL ASTRAY.

When they hear the definition of "beastfolk" as "anthropomorphic animals", a lot of newcomers will ask just why beastfolk are accepted when the anti-furry thing is promoted with such vehemence. What this means in real language is that, on /tg/, a furry is defined by not only by its anthro aspects but also by being a creepy little perv; what /tg/ defines as a "furry" is more complex than just anthro. Having beastfolk in your setting, or playing a beastfolk character, isn't inherently bad. Even having some level of sexuality isn't bad - /tg/ can appreciate a musclegirl in a chainmail bikini. It's when you ramp up the sex level to the point the others at the table are creeped out that you've crossed the line.

Mind you, there is a vocal minority on /tg/ who assert that the only "real" way to present beastfolk is as mindless ravening monsters who have no culture and exist only to be slain. Most ignore these people, as they are likely just trying to stir shit.

List of Beastfolk

There are a lot of beastfolk races in /tg/ media, probably because "take an animal and make it humanoid" is as easy a way to come up with a distinctly "alien" race as any. Weird fact is, most of them come from Dungeons & Dragons, or at least have spread from there to other /tg/ media.

Non D&D Beastfolk:

D&D Beastfolk:

Monstergirls

This article or section is about Monstergirls (or a monster that is frequently depicted as a Monstergirl), something that /tg/ widely considers to be the purest form of awesome. Expect PROMOTIONS! and /d/elight in equal measure, often with drawfaggotry or writefaggotry to match.

Beastfolk get the monstergirls treatment fairly readily. Indeed, they're often argued as some of the most basic-level monstergirls who actually look inhuman, in contrast to elves (humans with pointy ears), dwarves and halflings (shortstacks) or gnomes (shortstack elves). Catgirls and cowgirls are extremely well-recognized monstergirls for a reason, and other beastfolk readily get the same treatment.

At their most basic, monstergirlified beastfolk consist of a human girl with animalistic ears and a tail on an otherwise human frame (taking some liberties for beasts that don't have ears, like lizards). This is the most recognizable form of beastgirl, to the point that /a/ has its own word for it: Kemonomimi, meaning "Animal Ears".

However, these monstergirls cover a wide spectrum, with multiple different sorts of animalistic traits that can be added. Now, species plays its part, but some of the common traits include:

  • Limbs partially or wholly in fur/scales/chitin
  • Paws, claws or hooves in place of feet.
  • Paw-like hands.
  • Partial patches of fur/scales/chitin on the body, usually emulating exotic lingerie or costume pieces.
  • Clawed fingers/toes.
  • Missing digits.
  • Fangs or other oddly shaped teeth.
  • Other, stranger traits depending on species - multiple nipples and/or breasts, gills, and so forth.

The rarest format of all for beastgirl is the "very near anthro", where you have what is basically an anthro - but with a human's face under a thin layer of fur/scales. This is an extremely rare style, and usually associated with anime-emulating artists. *BLAM* HERESY. THAT IS CLEARLY DESCRIBING SOME FORM OF MUTANT, NOT ONE OF THE EMPRAH'S BLESSED ABHUMANS.

Gallery

Furries

WARNING: THESE IMAGES ARE HIGHLY HERETICAL IN NATURE, AND POSTING THEM CAN EARN A GLOBAL *BLAM* FROM /tg/. POST AT YOUR OWN RISK.

Monstergirls
Retrieved from "http://23.235.193.55/mediawiki/index.php?title=Beastfolk&oldid=62481"