1d4chan>FlintTD |
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {| style="border:#8B8989 1px solid; width:100%" |
| | | style="padding:5px; background-color:#EEE9E9" | |
| <div style="float:right; margin:1em;">__TOC__</div> | | <div style="float:right; margin:1em;">__TOC__</div> |
|
| |
| ==Library?==
| |
| Well, I thought maybe we should make something like a /tg/-related book catalog? We already have an article about Tolkien, perhaps we can also write about some fantasy and sci-fi classics, like say Azimov, Martin, Pratchett etc, minding that we both discuss them on /tg/ and have games based on their works? What do you think, guys? [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 02:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| :Meh, the real question is who will want to write up such a catalog. --[[Special:Contributions/216.221.96.202|216.221.96.202]] 21:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| ==Spambots==
| |
| Yes we has them. Check out the edit history for [[BidBang]]. It looked like a spambot, and I translated it to make sure. Problem: the spambot "fixes" the article from multiple sources, which makes it look like it's a real article and real humans are making changes. --[[User:NotBrandX|NotBrandX]] 17:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :Another spambot showed up, this time attacked [http://1d4chan.org/index.php?title=Pauldrons&oldid=47627 Pauldrons] with seekarium javascript. Can't wait for a spambot to add XSS or other trojan javascript. --[[User:NotBrandX|NotBrandX]] 13:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
| Fucking spambots; how do they work? More of them lately. --[[User:NotBrandX|NotBrandX]] 18:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| :There's been an explosion of spambots in the past week. They will usually probe a page by adding a "harmless" edit that says something like "Hi, I'm new to this forum, I hope we can be friends," and if that edit is successful then the spambot (sometimes from a different IP) will wipe out their edit or the whole page with an advertisement. Maybe this is to make it harder to repair, since you'd need to undo each change in reverse order to get rid of all the spambot edits. As much as I lurve Anonymous, I weep for the day editors spend more time undoing spam than writing original content. --[[User:NotBrandX|NotBrandX]] 14:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
| Isn't there supposed to be a captcha if someone tries to post a URL into an article?<br>
| |
| Wikifag, can you block IP's under 98.*.*.*? or I think we should restrict editing rights to registered users --[[User:Grau|Grau]] 08:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Best article voting== | | ==Best article voting== |
| '''Best Article For <s>April</s> May (June?):''' | | '''Best Article For December:''' |
|
| |
|
| *<nowiki>[[Your_Mother]]</nowiki> | | *<nowiki>[[Your_Mother]]</nowiki> |
| *<nowiki>http://1d4chan.org/index.php?title=Dungeons_%26_Dragons_4th_Edition&diff=prev&oldid=60477</nowiki> | | *[[Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition]] |
| *[[Special:Log/block]] | | *[[Special:Log/block]] |
| *[[God-Emperor_of_Mankind]] | | *[[God-Emperor_of_Mankind]] |
| | *[[Warhammer 40,000]] |
| | *[[My Little Pony]] |
| | *[[The Toilets of the 41st Millennium]] |
| | *[[1d4chan]] |
|
| |
|
| ==Actual projects== | | ==Actual projects== |
| ===Homebrew Games!=== | | ===Homebrew Games!=== |
| * [[:/tg/'s homebrews]] - Glorious homebrew games of all shapes and sizes, and in various stages of completion. | | * [[:/tg/'s homebrews]] - Glorious homebrew games of all shapes and sizes, and in various stages of completion. |
| | * [[/tg/ 40,000]]- the myriad Space Marine Chapters, Imperial Guard Regiments, and numerous other factions that /tg/ has homebrewed into the 40k setting. |
|
| |
|
| ===Easymode=== | | ===Easymode=== |
| Line 51: |
Line 45: |
| ====Wargames==== | | ====Wargames==== |
| *[[Mage Knight]] | | *[[Mage Knight]] |
| | *[[WARMACHINE]] |
| *[[HORDES]] | | *[[HORDES]] |
| *[[Project Daussalt]] | | *[[Project Daussalt]] |
| Line 71: |
Line 66: |
| *[[Necron]] | | *[[Necron]] |
| *[[Sisters of Battle]] | | *[[Sisters of Battle]] |
| *[[Tyranid]] | | *[[Tyranids]] |
| *[[Witchhunters]] | | *[[Witchhunters]] |
| | *[[Space Marines]] |
| | *[[Tau]] |
| | *[[Chaos Space Marines]] |
| | *[[Chaos|Chaos Daemons]] |
| | |
| | ====Warhammer/Tactics==== |
| | {{Warhammer_Tactics_Races}} |
|
| |
|
| ===D&D=== | | ===D&D=== |
| We sure need more informative articles on these topics: | | We sure need more informative articles on these topics: |
| {{D&D3-Classes}} | | {{D&D3e-Classes}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Useful links== | | ==Useful links== |
| *[http://boards.4chan.org/tg/ http://boards.4chan.org/tg/] /tg/ in all its glory | | *[http://boards.4chan.org/tg/ http://boards.4chan.org/tg/] /tg/ in all its glory |
| | *[https://8ch.net/tg/ https://8ch.net/tg/] that other /tg/ |
| *[http://boards.4chan.org/tg/rss.xml RSS feed for /tg/] | | *[http://boards.4chan.org/tg/rss.xml RSS feed for /tg/] |
| *[http://catalog.neet.tv/tg/ 4cat catalog of /tg/] better than the catalog.html that is built-in. | | *[http://catalog.neet.tv/tg/ 4cat catalog of /tg/] better than the catalog.html that is built-in. |
| Line 85: |
Line 88: |
|
| |
|
| *<s>[http://chan.nat20games.com /tg/ oriented image board]</s> gone. (april 2011) | | *<s>[http://chan.nat20games.com /tg/ oriented image board]</s> gone. (april 2011) |
| *[http://imagedump.nat20games.com /tg/ character portrait image dump] | | *<s>[http://imagedump.nat20games.com /tg/ character portrait image dump]</s> gone. (february 2016) |
| *<s>[http://www.iiichan.net/boards/tabletop/wakaba.html Waka/iichan tabletop board]</s> (been under rennovation for months - april 2011) | | *<s>[http://www.iiichan.net/boards/tabletop/wakaba.html Waka/iichan tabletop board]</s> (been under rennovation for months - april 2011, as of february 2016, it 404s.) |
| *[http://boardgamegeek.com/ BoardGameGeek] huge database bluh bluh | | *[http://boardgamegeek.com/ BoardGameGeek] huge database |
| *[http://rpggeek.com/ RPGgeek] same idea as Boardgamegeek but kinda clunky | | *[http://rpggeek.com/ RPGgeek] same idea as Boardgamegeek but kinda clunky |
| | *[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Cheatsheet-en.png MediaWiki syntax cheatsheet] |
|
| |
|
| ==Completed Projects== | | ==Completed Projects== |
| Line 108: |
Line 112: |
| ::Yes --[[Special:Contributions/173.51.254.138|173.51.254.138]] 03:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC) | | ::Yes --[[Special:Contributions/173.51.254.138|173.51.254.138]] 03:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| ==Best article voting: past months==
| | |} |
| So, we've talked over it. Let's now get to business, and vote for the best article for September.
| |
| | |
| I say we have two rounds: first, we suggest articles-candidates; say, to 24.08.08. Each article gets voted for, every wikipedian has one vote.
| |
| | |
| Then, we have second round, where three highest-scoring articles from the first round compete using the same voting system with the [[template:Vote|Vote template]]. Then we'll have the winner by 01.09.08.
| |
| | |
| UPD: So, no second round, then? Should we just keep voting?
| |
| | |
| ===Round one: Suggestions===
| |
| [[Sameo]] article.
| |
| :{{Vote}} [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 09:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} I don't care if it's bullshit - [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 11:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} It's an awesome story, no matter what. --[[User:Rodwell|Rodwell]] 14:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} It's not the most informative article, however, it's the most hilariously awesome. --[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 16:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Betrayal at House on the Hill]] Not to be plugging my own crap, but it is very informative as to the game.--[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 06:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Love Can Bloom]] doesn't have my vote, but I'm pretty sure putting it here is mandatory. Also, are you actually allowed to vote multiple times, Anonykota? - [[User:Ahri|Ahri]] 19:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :I guess it's possible to suggest one article and vote for the other. Why not, after all. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 02:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[K59]], if just for the ending. [[Special:Contributions/58.168.73.117|58.168.73.117]] 04:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Tarrasque]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} Not very informative, but [[awesome]]. - [[User:Ahri|Ahri]] 12:36, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} Tarrasque, FUCK YEAH! [[User:BladePHF|BladePHF]] 20:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ===Round two: Best article September===
| |
| | |
| So are we putting in our votes or what? [[User:NightRapier|NightRapier]] 04:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| : I thought we're to vote on several most popular articles, but since there are just two articles with votes for them at all, I suppose we can just keep it all in one place. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 21:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Best article October===
| |
| It's getting towards the end of the month so new suggestions or votes for old ones would be appreciated for next month's featured article (provided [[User:Wikifag|Wikifag]] can find new hosting of course). - [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 01:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Examples of Play]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} Hilarious Copy Pasta --[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 22:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 14:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :{{Vote}} [[User:Novichock|Novichock]] 23:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Kharn]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} He is such a nice guy! [[User:BladePHF|BladePHF]] 07:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| [[Planescape]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} A good and informative article about an interesting setting. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 03:20, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Best article November===
| |
| Let's get this rolling. --[[Special:Contributions/216.221.111.179|216.221.111.179]] 18:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| Sure, here's what was nominated previous months, feel free to vote for them or nominate a new article -- [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 02:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *[[Betrayal at House on the Hill]]
| |
| *[[Love Can Bloom]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} - Oh come on guys, we can't possibly have this article in the wiki and not award it with something. It's epic and the very base of /tg/ fluff. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]]
| |
| *[[K59]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} - Awesome writefaggotry -- [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 02:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :[[Image:180px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png|15px]] '''{{{1|Vote}}}''' - It passed. --[[User:Pantsuru Man|Pantsuru Man]] 21:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| *[[Tarrasque]]
| |
| *[[Kharn]]
| |
| *[[Planescape]]
| |
| *[[Truly Immovable Rod]]
| |
| :{{Vote}} - As a physics nerd, I found this hilarious and seriously, who couCLANG! WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT?.--[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 03:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| I suggest adding a couple of rules: no voting on the same article for a month or two after it was first nominated unless it has been significantly changed; and perhaps no voting for writefaggotry? Or maybe let's make a separate category for writefaggotry?
| |
| Otherwise it just turns into 'Choose the best writefaggotry article from a list of the variants. Oh, you like this one the most? We remove it, what about now?' [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 03:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :I don't know about that first point. It's not like we're discounting the other nominated articles because they aren't up to scratch. At least not at the moment.
| |
| :Also most of the articles on here are originally writefaggotry, including your nomination this month of Love Can Bloom. Treating them separately is silly as they are as much of a part of /tg/ as the games systems themselves. -- [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 07:18, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::What I'm saying is that it can get quite stupid; nominating the same articles over and over practically insures that they get the award sooner or later (oh, and also leads to same people voting for the same article month after month until it finally wins).
| |
| ::I feel that we must encourage the wikipedian effort at editing and creating articles from scratch first and most of all; as writing an article about writefaggotry is essentially copypasting it from the original thread, it's not much of effort on our side anyway. This way we in fact award the original writefaggotry and its author(s), not the article, know what I'm saying? [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 13:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::You make valid points. How about this compromise: if we decide that an article isn't worthy because of some problem with its formatting, grammar etc., then it can't be renominated until it's fixed ''and'' an article can't be nominated by the same person more than once. Otherwise we're going to run out of decent articles to nominate. -- [[User:Tgcodefag|Tgcodefag]] 07:33, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Not that we nominate any articles with that kind of problems anyway, right? The second bit seems reasonable, though.
| |
| ::::The point with wrtefaggotry still stands. Or maybe we could just make a separate template for them to show the innate difference between an article the wikipedians wrote and a writefaggotry they looted somewhere.
| |
| | |
| Hmmmmmmm. It r November.--[[Special:Contributions/216.221.113.158|216.221.113.158]] 01:28, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :Not nearly enough votes, as you can clearly see. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 05:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::Oh god wat, voting still open? --[[User:Pantsuru Man|Pantsuru Man]] 21:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::Why isn't the November article shown on the main page? [[User:NightRapier|NightRapier]] 04:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::::Because I suck at writing things, and it seems like I was the only one around in the beginning of November. Feel free to correct it. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 05:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::::Righto, I didn't think we were allowed to mess with the front page. Fixed. [[User:NightRapier|NightRapier]] 06:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Best article December===
| |
| Let's get the party started.
| |
| The only rule we agreed upon is that the same article can't be nominated by the same person twice.
| |
| | |
| :[[Warhammer 40,000]], tis the season. [[User:NightRapier|NightRapier]] 06:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| :[[Local Game Store]] Seems very useful for finding one. --[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 23:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| ::Find me one with it, hahaha. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 16:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::[http://ww2.wizards.com/Company/Info/default.aspx?doc=Europeretailers|| DO IT FAGGOT] Pick one near you.--[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 01:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::::My country isn't in the list, derp. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 21:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| :::::I already knew that. I said pick one near you. HERP DA DERP.--[[User:Anonykota|Anonykota]] 00:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::::::Would you please make an effort and finally learn what Local in "LGS" means? [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 07:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :So when do we decide again? [[User:NightRapier|NightRapier]] 12:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| ::Well, we were supposed to have decided by December 1st, but since there's no one to vote, really - herp. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 21:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ===Best article February===
| |
| Same articled can't be nominated by the same person twice, derp derp.
| |
| | |
| :[[Exalted]] - [[User:Kas|Kas]] 21:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| :[[Ruby Quest]]. Who are we trying to fool here. [[User:Fatum|Fatum]] 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| :[[Ruby Quest]] - [[User:Solarion|Solarion]] 19:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| :[[Ruby Quest]]. Having wrote it in the first place, I may be biased, but this page is extremely thorough, a perfect archive of everything Ruby Quest, and eventually stopped all the stupid discussion threads from being archived just by existing. - [[User:Gnome7|Gnome7]] 20:00, 25 January 2009 (UTC) {{vote}}
| |
| I guess it's decided, then.
| |
| | |
| Test.
| |
| | |
| ===Someone Needing a Banhammer to the Face===
| |
| This nutter: [[User:46.17.96.43]]. The ballsack keeps deleting the [[Board-tans]] article. The troll needs to be seriously banhammered, and his comments in the "reasons why I am changing this" section seem repetitive and bot-like. I'll even put my signature on this. --[[User:FlintTD|FlintTD]] 01:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
| |
