Rant:Feats Suck: Difference between revisions
1d4chan>Piroko No edit summary |
m (11 revisions imported) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Rant}} | |||
[[File:Feats_Suck.jpg|right|300px]] | [[File:Feats_Suck.jpg|right|300px]] | ||
Talents. Class benefits. Archetype benefits. | Talents. Class benefits. Archetype benefits. |
Latest revision as of 10:22, 22 June 2023
This article is the opinion of one of our users (as denoted by the "Rant:" prefix). If you have a problem with it, take it up with the user on the article's talk page. |
Talents. Class benefits. Archetype benefits.
Aka feats.
They suck.
Whoever thought it was a good idea to create "class X's flavor of hitting someone with a stick" should be damned to the deepest depths of hell, for it serves no purpose but to pad out books with more copies of the same goddamn actions.
In Iron Kingdoms it was spells; every magic class had their own specific versions of the same damn effects. Why? Because gun mages need their flaming runeshot. Sorcerers need their fireball. Arcane mechanics need their fire runeplate. Repeat for blessed effects, cold effects, etc.
In Pathfinder/Starfinder, every class needs a dozen pages just to explain all its specific feats, many of which are pretty damn similar if not literally identical.