Editing
Zork
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{/vg/}}{{oldschool}} '''Zork''' is /v/. Actually... we're unsure /v/ would exist if not for ''Zork''. This isn't where [[interactive fiction]] a.k.a. text-adventure got its start but it ''is'' where it broke into the mainstream. Basically what this phenomenon is, is a quartet of MIT nerds screwing around on the shared terminals of the late 1970s, trying to redo ''Advent'' in part to make mock of it. ''Advent'' was already halfway a parody of fantasy-tropes mixed in with a cave-exploration simulator, so ''Zork'' amped up teh funneh. So that's what you do: get into a cavern-system and loot it. Adding to the experience, you share the system with another adventurer - The Thief - who does what Belloc will do to Indy in ''Raiders of the Lost Ark''. Yes that is a future-tense. This game is OLD SCHOOL. This game lampshades the 1970s [[mimesis]]-breaking tropes from ''Advent'' and Scott "Not Dilbert" Adams like the risk of falling down a pit in a dark room where - when the lights come back on - there are no fucking pits. In ''Zork'', you get eaten by [[grue]]s - from [[Jack Vance]]βs Dying Earth Saga. In 1979 these four figured they could make some bank off this thing and formed Infocom, to sell it. Except "it" had to be a "them", since the nerds'd tinkered this game into a monster that would never fit on a single 1970s-era cassette or massive magnetic disc. Oh those were the days. So: Zork I, II, and III. It made the Infocom doodz filthy stinking rich until they dumped all their money into [[What|making business software]], like idiots. There was later a Zork Zero with some graphical stuff which was okay, and spinoffs like the ''Enchanter'' series which was awesome. Activision bought the rights to Zork and to the Infocom name, producing ''Return to Zork'' which was badly flawed (although a moneymaker); Cecilia Barajas' ''Nemesis'' which was great and terrifying - but not in the Zork spirit; and finally Margaret Stohl's ''Zork Grand Inquisitor'' which was a laugh riot but nobody bought. Do please at least play that last one. Quite a few [[Meme]]s got their start from the ''Zork'' universe. Want some rye? COURSE YA DO. As to the game itself - there ''are'' some problems with it, which problems the authors should have figured out from ''Advent'' but didn't. Like: the maze of twisty passages all alike. Likewise: "Tower Of Hanoi" where you have insufficient inventory-space to carry all your shit from A to B, so you have to juggle putting some of your stuff HERE and the rest THERE. Since we've already seen such "puzzles" we do not need to go through it again. Inexperienced designers of role-playing dungeons get tempted to do some of this, too ([[Q1: Queen of the Demonweb Pits]] is a twisty-passage offender). Please do not do this.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:/vg/
(
edit
)
Template:Oldschool
(
edit
)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information