Editing
Party Archetypes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
As so often with most stories that we know and love as the roleplayers we are, PCs often fit into different roles in the party both inside and outside of combat. This can be planned out before the game starts ("okay, I'll play a melee tanky character so you can get some room while preparing your spells."), to a naturally developed synergy in the party ("Your character is very heroic and has all the good plans - Only natural you be the leader!"), to a party that completely ditches any kinds of tropes and roles and just does whatever the hell they feel like. As a matter of fact, any group will often end up being unique in its own way unless the players are truly devoid of any kind of strategic planning or imagination, or if they play as example characters from the rulebooks... But who does that anyway? There are, as mentioned, two kinds of roles: What role your character takes in combat (the combat role), and what role your character takes during social encounters (the non-combat role). On top of this, there's also the role the character takes socially within the group and the story as a whole (the story role). This list is kept on a separate page to keep the [[Party]] page clean, and to allow anyone to edit all their poorly/awesome stereotypes free from anything that actually matters. == The Balanced Party == You may have often heard that a given party in a game should preferably be a balanced one and upon possibly enquiring further you got buried under an avalanche of recommendations and min-maxing strategies. This section will not bother you with all that (that's what the ones below are for), it will instead give a quick and concise overview of what generally constitutes a ˝balanced˝ party. Most games will throw a wide array of situations and problems at you that will require a similarly diverse array of PCs to handle effectively while also ensuring a nice synergy and mutual support. In order to do this and assuming a minimum party of 4 and a max of 6, your group should be built as follows: * Warrior - Someone to kick ass and take names. * Mage - Support for the others be it healing, offensive spellcasting or technical. * Rogue - Getting into places and obtaining things that you aren't supposed to in-game. * Bard - High charisma or other social stat that handles diplomacy and dialogue * Ranger/Sniper - Additional asskicker that can be specced as Nuker or Smart Bomb, allowing the warrior to go into tank or AOE role. * Artificer/Alchemist - Having another class that can do a lot of stuff can't hurt and it can free the Mage to spec into a more specific role as circumstances demand. With the first four of the above you basically have a, well, basic balanced party that should be able to handle most of the situations that the GM/DM throws at you, provided they are not an asshole of course. The latter two may be eschewed, reserved for an interested friend getting brought into the hobby or even handled by NPCs if the party needs more flexibility or the game is progressing to a more challenging mid and late stages. Additionally, some games have the ability for characters to multiclass/dual-class which aside from giving you more playstyle options also partially solves the balance issue as a ¨mage-knight¨ may dish out damage as well as do spells while a ˝rogue bard˝ can do diplomacy and stealth as needed. This approach can drastically increase what your party can do and thus bring in not only more balance but also more options for handling various situations. Do note that the ˝balanced party˝ does not need to look exactly like this - you may have a warrior archetype instead of the Mage or Rogue and still do fine (and you can have the positions 5 and 6 reserved for ''necessary'' roles that get NPCd in case someone does not want to be pressured into a role). Lastly, as the following sections demonstrate, there is a fuckton of specialised roles a given archetype can take on so you are more than free to play with your party composition to find what an ideal/balanced party is, so go out and play! == Combat Roles == Remember: while these roles were written with tabletop RPGs in mind, you can apply these roles to other types of games to help evaluate the forces you and your opponent bring to the table. For example, a [[DISTRACTION_CARNIFEX|Vindicator]] could be seen as the Meatshield for a Predator tank in the Maxim role, Pathfinders would be a mix of support and nerfer and so on. *'''DPS Roles''': These are party roles that involve dealing damage and are the life blood of any party focused on combat. DPS, or 'damage per second' a term we loaned from /v/, are all about dealing damage and reducing the enemies' health until they drop down dead. However DPS characters tend to be balanced by having lower defense and health meaning that if engaged they will die quickly. This gives a DPS character two options, either pile on more damage and hope they can kill the enemy before they die, or grab a tank to hold the enemy at arm's length to stop them. **'''Nuker''': A Nuker deals their damage all at once in one big burst, or 'nuke'. Nukers are often tied to a limited number of activations such as with Vancian magic, a limited pool of resources such as with systems with 'mana' bars or ammunition. This means on top of their softness due to being a DPS, a Nuker has to deal with only being able to blast every so often, meaning Nukers need to be able to make good choices about when to Nuke or not. Furthermore, Nukers, as can be summarized in the title, often inflict damage in an area of effect, often just called an AOE, meaning they can hit multiple enemies and allies at once. **'''Smart Bombs''': Similar to a Nuker, a Smart Bomb deals a lot of damage all at once, but unlike a Nuker it's focused and can only destroy one or two targets at once. This is both a good and a bad thing. It's good because you're not likely to kill your poor Tank when your fireball deviates a bit off course. It's bad because while you do as much damage as a Nuker, it's focused. Example: You are attacked by 5 goblins with 10 hit points each. A Nuker could use one AOE ability to deal 10 damage to each goblin at once, while a Smart Bomb could deal 50 damage to one goblin. Both of them do fifty hit points of damage, but the Nuker would eliminate all the threats with a casual flick of their wrists. However, if the same two wizards were attacked by a troll with 50 hit points, the Smart Bomb would be better. Most RPG's have a generic 'wizard' or equivalent class that can take traits of either Nuker or Smart Bomb. **'''Maxim''': Unlike a Nuker or Smart Bomb, a Maxim (a type of machine gun) deals low amounts of damage but does so consistently and slowly chips away at the enemy's health. Maxims compared to Nukers and Smart Bombs have a number of benefits. Firstly, they are more efficient and don't need to use a death laser damage to knock out one crab. Unlike Nukers, they rarely have hard limits on their damage and can keep up the damage even when a Nuker needs to rest for eight hours. However Maxims do have drawbacks, their damage balances out over time but in the short term a DPS does not do nearly as much damage as a Nuker, meaning that, at best, they are taking out one or two targets a turn, leaving the rest intact and able to do damage. Furthermore, because they're slower they're a much bigger target, since after they attack they have to stay and keep attacking, giving the enemy time to deal with them. **'''Berserker''': Berserkers deal high amounts of damage, but unlike other DPS's they have to be close to the enemy do so, often times right in melee range. This means that Berserkers can't fight from safety but must be exposed directly to the enemy meaning that they have to always strike a balance between self defense and damage. Berserkers tend to have higher defense than other DPS but not as much as a pure Tank. Note: despite the name Berserkers are more than guys with axes and included in this role are any 'class' in a system that has high amounts of short range damage regardless if they can be called Berserkers, Paladins, or Wizards. **'''DOT'er''': ''Damage over Time''. A class with a focus on dots can be seen as similar to a Nuker or Smart Bomb, (depending on if they can give a dot to one target or multiple) and a Maxim. Like a Maxim, their damage happens over time but only as an aftereffect of one attack. A DOT'er may deal five damage with an attack which then does five damage a turn for five turns. DOT'ers become really dangerous if they can stack DOT's and that five damage a turn can become ten, 15, 20 or more per turn if it can be applied enough times. DOT'ers are often wizards in fantasy RPG's but rogues with the right types of Poison can also fill this role. **'''Hunter''': Deals damage but only deals their highest amount of damage against a limited ranges of targets; be it Evil, Good, Demons, Magic users, Robots, people named Jorge, Hunters have an ability that works best against a narrow selection of targets. If someone is limited in options because the target is not of a certain type that person is a Hunter. Hunters are limited in usefulness to a Party unless they know they will be up against targets of the Hunter's chosen specialty enough to make the lower damage against other targets worth it. For example a Rogue or Vivisectionist would be useless in a dungeon crawl against Oozes, Elementals, and Ghosts, as those enemy types ignore Sneak Attack Damage, while a Paladin would find themselves far less useful if they never fought against an enemy with an Evil alignment, or the Undead type. Sometimes Hunters rely on battlefield circumstances rather than enemy types to be more effective in their role; Ambushes, Favored Terrains, and Spells that require environmental conditions are examples of a Hunter's ability to play off of the environment rather than enemy type. **'''Crit Fisher''': In some systems, attacks have a chance to deal more damage based on the attack roll; this is called a critical success or critical hit, or just crit for short. Crit fishers inflate this chance so that they should get at least one critical hit each round. This is usually done with Feats (Improved Critical, etc), weapon choice and attacking as often as possible (dual-wielding), but some classes are particularly focused on crits and gain the ability to stretch their critical ranges further, automatically confirm critical hits, or cause extra effects with critical hits. Not to be confused with Hunters who use positioning to deal damage, often with an ability called 'backstab'. While often mechanically similar to Crits, backstab-like abilities are situational damage and thus party members that focus on that kind of situational usefulness are Hunters. *'''Tank''': They take hits for the rest of the party. Any damage they can deal is an added benefit and the real focus of a Tank is to allow the DPS's to do their thing. Despite the name, Tanks do not typically have heavy firepower, they instead focus on using their high durability to take hits for their more fragile party members. Tanks often have abilities that make enemies either want to hit them (such as with large attack penalties against anyone other than the Tank), block attacks that target nearby allies, or force enemies to hit them, the latter group are often called 'taunts'. **'''Panzer''': The Tankiest of Tanks, Panzers focus on negating damage. The enemy can hit them, but does no damage to them because their defense is too thick for them to get through: too much armor, dodge, parry, DR/-, etc; the enemy cannot harm a Panzer. These types of defenses tend to be equipment based, thick armor for example, so they can be stacked with Meatshield (see below) for high health and high defense but not always. A Rogue or Ninja that can dodge anything is also a Panzer since they're absorbing damage without suffering any reduction to their health; if the enemy can hit them, such classes may be squishy. That is what makes a Panzer a Panzer. If their defense is negated, and they're at an excessive disadvantage, that means they are a Panzer (these guys are called Kites, or Mosquitos to borrow from MMORPG's, *shudder*). **'''Meatshield''': Unlike a Panzer who negates damage, a Meatshield eats it up and asks for more. They have high health and so can suffer a lot of damage before dying. On one hand this means that if what defense they do have is negated they don't care so much since they were not relying on it, but on the other it means that if they get in over their heads, they have no back up plan and all that health can quickly dry up. It also means that they need high power healing to keep them alive for any extended period of time, and not pull a 15-minute adventuring day. **'''Paladin''': A common archetype, a Paladin combines aspects of a Tank's defense with a Healer's ability to heal. Any damage they do take they can heal themselves, which means that they share some of the party healer's burden. Due to the fact that a character that can both take damage and then heal it off is generally a game breaker, Paladins will often feature a "catch". This can be anything from the classic DnD example where a Paladin was forced to act in a certain way or lose access to their nifty powers and become a worse version of a fighter, to a mechanically enforced inferiority to pure Healers and Tanks (the textbook "jack of all trades, master of none" problem). *'''Controller''': Controllers excel at making their opponents unable to hit the party without drawing enemy attention to themselves like a Tank does. Whether by freezing them in place, coating the floor in grease so they slip, distracting them with a hologram or [[Troll|forcing them to spend turns attacking each other rather than the party]], a Controller is about controlling the battlefield (hence the name) so that the DPS and other low defense targets can do their job safely; however, they themselves are often rather squishy so they operate best with a Tank to deal with anything that their abilities can't lock down. The line between a Controller and a Nerfer is often blurry since the roles overlap a lot, but the difference is a Nerfer makes an opponent worse at something like attack or defense, while a Controller makes an opponent unable to control where, when, and how they can move and attack, making them easy prey for the DPS's. *'''Support/Nerfer''': Supports (sometimes referred to as 'Buffer') don't do much by themselves, they make other members of the party stronger (or 'buff' them in /v/-speak) and better able to fulfill their own roles. Nerfers on the other hand are the direct opposite of the Support; instead of helping allies, they weaken enemies and render them less able to perform their own roles (and are hence sometimes referred to as 'de-buffers'). **'''Healer/Curser''': Healers are exactly what it says on the tin, people who heal up lost hit points. You can think of them as the opposite of a DPS, a DPS makes the health go down, while a Healer makes it go up. Healers allow a party to win wars of attrition with enemies and mean that lesser challenges don't stack up and kill the players eventually. Cursers on the other hand reduce the enemy's ability to heal making them less able to recover from damage the party does to them. **'''Doctor''': Healers have the ability to heal, Doctors do not, and carry disposable one use healing items. Sometimes they have the ability to produce them, other times they're just the party member the rest give all the health potions to to keep them safe while they hit things in the face. They are also the people that stop DOT's, nerfs, curses, and other nasty draining effects before they become too much to handle. Where a Healer keeps your HP at a certain level even if your blood is draining away like it's going out of fashion, a Doctor keeps your blood inside you. **'''Armorer/Penetrators''': Increase the defense of a member of a party. Armorers, despite the name, can also increase non-armor defenses, such as dodge chance. Armorers effectively stack more obstacles between an ally's health and an enemy's damage. Penetrators are able to reduce an enemy's defense and allow DPS to hit home better. **'''Whetstone/Sword Beater''': The Whetstone increases an ally's damage, while a Sword Beater (borrowed from the quote ''beat their swords into plowshares,'' from the Bible) reduces the enemy's ability to deal damage. **'''Trainers/Enfeeblers''': Trainers increase an ally's base statistics like strength or dexterity. Enfeeblers do the opposite and reduce an enemy's base statistics. **'''Quartermaster''': Like an Armorer or a Whetstone except they can not use their abilities in a fight, but before it and as such require preparation. **'''Burglar''': If you've read the Hobbit, the name should clue you into what this guy does. It's not just about stealing, the Burglar does all the miscellaneous things that need sneakiness on a 'tactical level', such as scouting, stealing keys, getting into position to set up an ambush and more. Burglars sometimes have limited damage options, but not always and some Burglars can transition into Crit Fishers, Panzers if they have enough dodge, or even Berserkers when the fight does break out. **'''Chemists''': Individuals with little damage on their own, but can make and then use items that can deal damage. Think of them like a man with a bag of grenades, they can deal a lot of damage until they run of grenades, then they need to run off and get more. Pathfinder's Alchemist class is the archetype of this form of play if you decide to focus on their Bombing abilities. **'''Entrencher/Sapper''': Entrenchers focus taking a battlefield and making it more advantageous to fight on. Depending on how they do it they can emulate other roles. If they use mine-like objects they could be considered DPS's, a trap that slows or stops the enemy could be nerfers, an ability that increases damage around a flag would be a support, and so on. Entrenchers are defined by their need to prep the ground beforehand. This makes them a role focused on defense and of more limited use when attacking or in situations when unable to prepare. Sappers on the other hand can negate an enemy's defensive emplacements; typically these defenses manifest as traps and a good Sapper can prevent the party from getting killed before they get to the fight. **'''Blesser/Hexer''': Blessers grant ability to the party that, while useful, don't directly aid in damage done or damage taken. For example, flight or ability to breathe underwater. Hexers negate the opponents' blessings like incorporealness. Hexes are often part of a '''Hunter's''' abilities but can also aid the party as they make the target easier for everyone to fight. **'''Commander''': Commanders are those people who bring in outside support. They hire NPC's and lead them. Sometimes Commanders have abilities that act like a Support and so bring more allies so they can get more bang for their buck when they use their abilities. A ten point damage increase among two people is only twenty damage, but giving six people ten damage is sixty damage. Commanders can also focus on one ally that's built into their ability, such as a Ranger/Druid with his pet, rather than hiring help. **'''Summoner''': Like a Commander only they create their own help, rather than relying on finding warm bodies in a tavern. The impermanence of summons can be both good and bad: they won't need healing after the fight's over, but they can also not be there when needed. **'''Jack-of-all-Trades''': They can do something of everything, but they won't be as good at it as a dedicated role might be. Usually not something to aim for: the party is served better by people being good at their own roles than by dabblers who are maybe decent at best. **'''Mutt''': Any combination of the above roles. Common ones include Support/Nerfer and Meatshield/Berserker. **'''[[Cheese|Cheddar]]''' **'''[[DMPC]]''' == Non-combat Roles == *'''Face:''' The guy who does the most talking, and the "face" of the party to the rest of society. Charm, negotiation, diplomacy, and all the other assorted people skills are what they do best. *'''Muscle:''' Sometimes negotiations can go better when there's a big beefy guy standing behind the negotiator looking mean and tough. That's where the Muscle comes in. They don't talk much, but they don't need to when a mean look or a solid smack can say so much more. *'''Hawk:''' The most perceptive member of the party, who's always watching for something that seems off. Usually makes a good detective or investigator. *'''Wallflower:''' The one guy who's just... there and doesn't seem to do much to get anybody's attention. Even the GM might forget he's around at times. *'''Shadow:''' The sneaky guy who always finds a way to be beneath notice. Often tends to be a Burglar or have a similarly stealthy inclination. *'''Pet Psycho/Do-gooder:''' His main gimmick is being the opposite alignment from everybody else in the party. Useful either as comedic relief or as a source of party conflict depending on the circumstances. *'''Librarian''': The party's geek. Good at finding and using obscure information which can occasionally be what the party needs to get shit done, but you shouldn't expect him to pull his weight in a fight unless he's a magic user. *'''Artisan''': He's good at crafting stuff. Ask him to make you that fancy Belt of Giant's Strength +4, but don't get on his bad side or you might get a Girdle of Opposite Sex instead. Oh, and be sure you have all the materials he needs. *'''[[DMPC]]''' == Story Roles == *'''Knight in Shining Armor''': The textbook good guy, always willing to sally forth and slay evil. His naivete can backfire on him on occasion, however, and he may be in for a nasty shock if it turns out that the world isn't as black and white as he thinks it is. *'''Charming Rogue''': Coin and cleavage are the primary motivations of this character, but he has a knack for charming the pants off people even as he picks their pockets. *'''Seeker''': Knowledge is power for this character, and he's always looking to learn more. That doesn't mean he can always handle what he learns. In settings like [[World of Darkness]] or [[Call of Cthulhu]], they are very likely to piss off the wrong supernatural being by asking the wrong questions and consequently die horribly. *'''Wanderer''': This character just wants to see the world, and doesn't like to stay in one place for too long if he has a choice. *'''Mercenary''': Money is all that matters to him, even more so than the Charming Rogue, and he doesn't have the "charming" part to fall back on. This also means his loyalty will inevitably be sold to the highest bidder. *'''[[Murderhobo]]''': He's just here to kill things and take their loot, and doesn't particularly care about the specifics. There is no such thing as collateral damage to them. *'''Fish out of Water''': This guy isn't native to the setting, either because he's a foreigner, [[Isekai|from a different time, or even another world]]. Naturally, he hasn't a clue what the hell is going on. Some of them may try to introduce their technology into the setting a la "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court". [[Rocks fall, everyone dies| A good DM will stop him before he can forcibly begin the Industrial Revolution.]] *'''Soldier''': His whole reason for existence is following orders, no matter how dangerous or arbitrary. *'''Daddy Issues''': This character's parents played a big role in shaping who he is. Sometimes it's trying to live up to a parent's fame, other times it's their death or disappearance, but family issues almost certainly played a role in his reason for adventuring. If done poorly, he's likely to come off as a whiny little shit. *'''Avenger''': He's obsessed with getting revenge, whether it's for the death of a loved one or the destruction of his home. Sometimes they can take it too far and become worse than whomever they want revenge against. *'''Zealot''': Mindless, all-consuming loyalty to an organization, ideal, or person is the main component of the character's personality. Expect conflicts within the party if they can't reconcile his fanaticism with the party's own goals in the event that they end up conflicting with one another. *'''Lazy Ripoff''': This character was directly copied from somewhere else. A punch in the face is the best way to deal with players who insist on using them. == See Also == *[[Party]], for the group these defunct lunatics form. *[[DM]], for guy trying to kill them with all tools available. [[Category:Roleplaying]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to 2d4chan may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
2d4chan:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information